Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23417210›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2014

Increased adherence to prenatal group B streptococcal screening guidelines through a paired electronic reminder and education intervention.

Kathy L MacLaughlin, Gregory M Garrison, Marc R Matthews, Marcia L O'Brien, Elizabeth Westby, Paul V Targonski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapid tests for detecting group B streptococcus colonization in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effectiveness of dissemination strategies of maternal clinical guidelines: A narrative review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathy L MacLaughlinDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. maclaughlin.kathy@mayo.edu.
Gregory M GarrisonDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Marc R MatthewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Marcia L O'BrienDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Elizabeth WestbyDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Paul V TargonskiDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) update on perinatal group B streptococcal (GBS) prevention advises universal vaginal-rectal GBS screening of pregnant women in the 35th through 37th week of gestation. Because GBS colonization is transient, a test performed more than 5 weeks before delivery may not have sufficient negative predictive value to be clinically useful. Our objective was to increase rates of quality-improved, CDC-adherent GBS screening and decrease repeat screening. A reminder for maternal vaginal-rectal GBS testing was added to the physicians' electronic ordering screen, and family medicine physicians and residents were educated about screening guidelines through standardized, in-person presentations. Retrospective chart review was performed before and after these interventions. Univariate or bivariate analysis was performed for demographic factors, timing of first screen, rates of CDC-adherent screening (the newly defined quality-improved screen and the usual screen), and rates of repeat and unnecessary screens. Multivariate analysis was performed with quality-improved and usual screening as dependent variables. Bivariate analysis showed that post-intervention rates of quality-improved screening increased from 30 to 62 % (P < .001), usual screening increased from 69 to 84 % (P = .005), and repeat GBS screening decreased from 20 to 8 % (P = .007). Multivariate analysis showed increased post-intervention odds of quality-improved screening [odds ratio (OR) 3.59; 95 % CI 2.07-6.34] and usual screening (OR 2.67; 95 % CI 1.40-5.25). Low-cost, reproducible quality improvement interventions (electronic order reminder, educational sessions) have the potential to increase guideline adherence for GBS screening in pregnant women and decrease repeat screening.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.FemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPhysicians, FamilyPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal DiagnosisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID23417210
OpenAlexW1979467117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.