Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23417090›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2014

Retrospective comparison of external fixation versus volar locking plate in the treatment of unstable intra-articular distal radius fractures.

Mert Kumbaraci, Levent Kucuk, Levent Karapinar, Cengizhan Kurt, Erhan Coskunol

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. External fixation versus volar locking plate for displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures: a prospective randomized comparative study of the functional outcomes.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2014
    Trial
  4. Are external fixators as effective as volar plates in multi-fragmented radius distal intra-articular fractures (AO type C)?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The rate and associated risk factors for acute carpal tunnel syndrome complicating a fracture of the distal radius.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mert KumbaraciDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Izmir-Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, 1609/13 Sok. No: 4/15 75. yil mah, 35100, Bayrakli, Izmir, Turkey, kumbaracimert@hotmail.com.
Levent Kucuk
Levent Karapinar
Cengizhan Kurt
Erhan Coskunol
Ege University · TRIzmir Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIzmir University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of open reduction and volar locking plates versus external fixation (EF) in the treatment of unstable intra-articular distal radius fractures. In this retrospective comparative study, 69 of 80 patients who underwent an operation for AO/ASIF C1, C2 and C3 distal radius fractures were assessed. Functional evaluation was performed using the Gartland-Werley scoring system and the PRWE scale, and wrist range of motion and grip strength was also measured. For the radiological assessment, radial inclination, volar tilt, radial length, ulnar variance, and articular step-off were compared. The range of movement was better for all parameters in the volar plate group, but only wrist flexion and pronation range differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.037 and p = 0.014, respectively). With the exception of better subjective functional results in the volar plate group, the differences were not significant. With respect to radiological evaluation, all parameters were better in the volar plate group, but only radial inclination and articular step-off were significantly better (p = 0.018 and p = 0.029, respectively). In the volar plate group, two patients had carpal tunnel syndrome and one patient had regional pain syndrome. In the external fixator group, six patients had superficial pin tract infection, two patients had sensory branch injury, and four patients had regional pain syndrome. Volar locking plate fixation appeared as a dependable method for the treatment of intra-articular distal radius, with lower complication rates. On the other hand, EF remains a suitable surgical alternative for these fractures, with easy application and acceptable results.

Indexed as

AdultBone PlatesExternal FixatorsFemaleFracture FixationHand StrengthHumansIntra-Articular FracturesMaleMiddle AgedPalmar PlateRadiographyRadius FracturesRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23417090
OpenAlexW2020254597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.