ArticleOncogene2014
Cancer driver-passenger distinction via sporadic human and dog cancer comparison: a proof-of-principle study with colorectal cancer.
Article in Oncogene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human basal-like breast cancer is represented by one of the two mammary tumor subtypes in dogs.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Article
- Shared hotspot mutations in oncogenes position dogs as an unparalleled comparative model for precision therapeutics.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Kmer-based paired-end readiScience · 2023Article
- Transcriptome analysis of the adenoma-carcinoma sequences identifies novel biomarkers associated with development of canine colorectal cancer.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- The Mechanism of Important Components in Canine Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- AVL9 promotes colorectal carcinoma cell migration via regulating EGFR expression.Biological procedures online · 2022Article
- Establishment of Canine Transitional Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Harboring BRAF V595E Mutation as a Therapeutic Target.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Canine tumor mutational burden is correlated with TP53 mutation across tumor types and breeds.Nature communications · 2021Article
- hsa_circ_0058357 acts as a ceRNA to promote non‑small cell lung cancer progression via the hsa‑miR‑24‑3p/AVL9 axis.Molecular medicine reports · 2021Article
- Immunohistochemical expression of β-catenin, Ki67, CD3 and CD18 in canine colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas.BMC veterinary research · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of a Nine-Gene Signature Related to Tumor Microenvironment in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Persistent Polyfunctional Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells That Target Glypican 3 Eliminate Orthotopic Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Mice.Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Identification of Key Genes Related to Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Bioinformatics Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Proliferative and Invasive Colorectal Tumors in Pet Dogs Provide Unique Insights into Human Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2018Article
- Somatic inactivating PTPRJ mutations and dysregulated pathways identified in canine malignant melanoma by integrated comparative genomic analysis.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Collaborating genomic, transcriptomic and microbiomic alterations lead to canine extreme intestinal polyposis.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Epigenome-Wide Association Study of Dietary Fiber Intake in African American Adolescents.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2018Article
- Changes in the faecal bile acid profile in dogs fed dry food vs high content of beef: a pilot study.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2018Article
- Omic Approach in Non-smoker Female with Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Pinpoints to Germline Susceptibility and Personalized Medicine.Cancer research and treatment · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Herein we report a proof-of-principle study illustrating a novel dog-human comparison strategy that addresses a central aim of cancer research, namely cancer driver-passenger distinction. We previously demonstrated that sporadic canine colorectal cancers (CRCs) share similar molecular pathogenesis mechanisms as their human counterparts. In this study, we compared the genome-wide copy number abnormalities between 29 human and 10 canine sporadic CRCs. This led to the identification of 73 driver candidate genes (DCGs), altered in both species, and with 27 from the whole genome and 46 from dog-human genomic rearrangement breakpoint (GRB) regions, as well as 38 passenger candidate genes (PCGs), altered in humans only and located in GRB regions. We noted that DCGs significantly differ from PCGs in every analysis conducted to assess their cancer relevance and biological functions. Importantly, although PCGs are not enriched in any specific functions, DCGs possess significantly enhanced functionality closely associated with cell proliferation and death regulation, as well as with epithelial cell apicobasal polarity establishment/maintenance. These observations support the notion that, in sporadic CRCs of both species, cell polarity genes not only contribute in preventing cancer cell invasion and spreading, but also likely serve as tumor suppressors by modulating cell growth. This pilot study validates our novel strategy and has uncovered four new potential cell polarity and colorectal tumor suppressor genes (RASA3, NUPL1, DENND5A and AVL9). Expansion of this study would make more driver-passenger distinctions for cancers with large genomic amplifications or deletions, and address key questions regarding the relationship between cancer pathogenesis and epithelial cell polarity control in mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.