Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23416726›Full record

ArticleNature materials2013

High-resolution three-photon biomedical imaging using doped ZnS nanocrystals.

Jung Ho Yu, Seung-Hae Kwon, Zdeněk Petrášek, Ok Kyu Park, Samuel Woojoo Jun, Kwangsoo Shin, Moonkee Choi, Yong Il Park, Kyeongsoon Park, Hyon Bin Na and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MnNature communications · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent advances in bioelectronics chemistry.Chemical Society reviews · 2020
    Review
  11. Emergence of Impurity-Doped Nanocrystal Light-Emitting Diodes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Inorganic semiconductor biointerfaces.Nature reviews. Materials · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jung Ho YuCenter for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), and School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Hae Kwon
Zdeněk Petrášek
Ok Kyu Park
Samuel Woojoo Jun
Kwangsoo Shin
Moonkee Choi
Yong Il Park
Kyeongsoon Park
Hyon Bin Na
Nohyun Lee
Dong Won Lee
Jeong Hyun Kim
Petra Schwille
Taeghwan Hyeon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-photon excitation is a process that occurs when three photons are simultaneously absorbed within a luminophore for photo-excitation through virtual states. Although the imaging application of this process was proposed decades ago, three-photon biomedical imaging has not been realized yet owing to its intrinsic low quantum efficiency. We herein report on high-resolution in vitro and in vivo imaging by combining three-photon excitation of ZnS nanocrystals and visible emission from Mn(2+) dopants. The large three-photon cross-section of the nanocrystals enabled targeted cellular imaging under high spatial resolution, approaching the theoretical limit of three-photon excitation. Owing to the enhanced Stokes shift achieved through nanocrystal doping, the three-photon process was successfully applied to high-resolution in vivo tumour-targeted imaging. Furthermore, the biocompatibility of ZnS nanocrystals offers great potential for clinical applications of three-photon imaging.

Indexed as

HumansManganeseNanoparticlesPhantoms, ImagingPhotonsSulfidesTumor Cells, CulturedZinc CompoundsManganeseSulfidesZinc Compoundszinc sulfide

Identifiers

PMID23416726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.