Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23415774›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2013

Body stature growth trajectories during childhood and the development of myopia.

Kate Northstone, Jeremy A Guggenheim, Laura D Howe, Kate Tilling, Lavinia Paternoster, John P Kemp, George McMahon, Cathy Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Baseline metrics that may predict future myopia in young children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kate NorthstoneSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. Kate.Northstone@bristol.ac.uk
Jeremy A Guggenheim
Laura D Howe
Kate Tilling
Lavinia Paternoster
John P Kemp
George McMahon
Cathy Williams
University of Bristol · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2009-02-35Medical Research Council G0600705Medical Research Council G1002375Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MR/J012165/1Wellcome Trust 090539Wellcome Trust 092731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStature at a particular age can be considered the cumulative result of growth during a number of preceding growth trajectory periods. We investigated whether height and weight growth trajectories from birth to age 10 years were related to refractive error at ages 11 and 15 years, and eye size at age 15 years.

designProspective analysis in a birth cohort.

participantsChildren participating in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) U.K. birth cohort (minimum N = 2676).

methodsGrowth trajectories between birth and 10 years were modeled from a series of height and weight measurements (N = 6815). Refractive error was assessed by noncycloplegic autorefraction at ages 11 and 15 years (minimum N = 4737). Axial length (AXL) and radius of corneal curvature were measured with an IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Welwyn Garden City, U.K.) at age 15 years (minimum N = 2676). Growth trajectories and an allelic score for 180 genetic variants associated with adult height were tested for association with refractive error and eye size.

main outcome measuresNoncycloplegic autorefraction at ages 11 and 15 years, and AXL and corneal curvature at age 15 years.

resultsHeight growth trajectory during the linear phase between 2.5 and 10 years was negatively associated with refractive error at 11 and 15 years (P<0.001), but explained <0.5% of intersubject variation. Height and weight growth trajectories, especially shortly after birth, were positively associated with AXL and corneal curvature (P<0.001), predicting 1% to 5% of trait variation. Height growth after 2.5 years was not associated with corneal curvature, whereas the association with AXL continued up to 10 years. The height allelic score was associated with corneal curvature (P = 0.03) but not with refractive error or AXL.

conclusionsUp to the age of 10 years, shared growth mechanisms contribute to scaling of eye and body size but minimally to the development of myopia. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

AdolescentBody HeightBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMyopiaProspective StudiesRefractive ErrorsRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23415774
PMCPMC4441725
OpenAlexW1979402376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.