Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23414680›Full record

ArticleMedical hypotheses2013

The EPIIC hypothesis: intrapartum effects on the neonatal epigenome and consequent health outcomes.

H G Dahlen, H P Kennedy, C M Anderson, A F Bell, A Clark, M Foureur, J E Ohm, A M Shearman, J Y Taylor, M L Wright and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical hypotheses, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Health outcomes following caesarean birth- An observational study of twins discordant for mode of delivery.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

H G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia. h.dahlen@uws.edu.au
H P Kennedy
C M Anderson
A F Bell
A Clark
M Foureur
J E Ohm
A M Shearman
J Y Taylor
M L Wright
S Downe
University of North Dakota · USYale University · USUniversity of Central Lancashire · GBUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

Environmental toxins and stem cell epigenetic remodelingR01ES022030 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI OHM, JOYCE ELLEN · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES022030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many published studies about the epigenetic effects of the prenatal and infant periods on health outcomes. However, there is very little knowledge regarding the effects of the intrapartum period (labor and birth) on health and epigenetic remodeling. Although the intrapartum period is relatively short compared to the complete perinatal period, there is emerging evidence that this time frame may be a critical formative phase for the human genome. Given the debates from the National Institutes of Health and World Health Organization regarding routine childbirth procedures, it is essential to establish the state of the science concerning normal intrapartum epigenetic physiology. EPIIC (Epigenetic Impact of Childbirth) is an international, interdisciplinary research collaboration with expertise in the fields of genetics, physiology, developmental biology, epidemiology, medicine, midwifery, and nursing. We hypothesize that events during the intrapartum period - specifically the use of synthetic oxytocin, antibiotics, and cesarean section - affect the epigenetic remodeling processes and subsequent health of the mother and offspring. The rationale for this hypothesis is based on recent evidence and current best practice.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionModels, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesLabor, ObstetricPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID23414680
PMCPMC3612361
OpenAlexW2009933471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.