Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23414472›Full record

ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2013

Molecular targets and mechanisms of radiosensitization using DNA damage response pathways.

David R Raleigh, Daphne A Haas-Kogan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Radiosensitizers in Cancer Therapy: A Global Bibliometric Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Energy Metabolism Is Altered in Radioresistant Rectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. DCLK1 Inhibition Sensitizes Colorectal Cancer Cells to Radiation Treatment.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David R RaleighDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daphne A Haas-Kogan

Funding

Translational InformaticsP30CA082103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jennifer Leigh Clarke · 1999 to 2026
$209.7M
Tissue CoreP50CA097257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joseph F Costello · 2002 to 2026
$57.4M
TRAINING IN BRAIN TUMOR BIOLOGY AND THERAPYT32CA009291 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI BERGER, MITCHEL S. · 1985 to 2001
$198k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082103NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097257NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular reaction to genomic instability includes a network of signal transduction pathways collectively referred to as the DNA damage response (DDR). Activated by a variety of DNA lesions, the DDR orchestrates cell cycle arrest and DNA repair, and initiates apoptosis in instances where damage cannot be repaired. As such, disruption of the DDR increases the prevalence of DNA damage secondary to incomplete repair, and in doing so, enhances radiation-induced cytotoxicity. This article describes the molecular agents and their targets within DDR pathways that sensitize cells to radiation. Moreover, it reviews the therapeutic implications of these compounds, provides an overview of relevant clinical trials and offers a viewpoint on the evolution of the field in the years to come.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA DamageHumansRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiation ToleranceSignal TransductionRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID23414472
PMCPMC3635474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.