ArticleBMC infectious diseases2013
No excess risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with serological markers of previous infection with Coxiella burnetii: evidence from the Danish National Birth Cohort.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence ofNew microbes and new infections · 2025Review
- Infection and Persistence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Seroprevalence of vector-borne pathogens in outdoor workers from southern Italy and associated occupational risk factors.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Serological, Molecular Prevalence and Genotyping ofVeterinary sciences · 2022Article
- FromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Q fever seroprevalence in parturient women: the EQRUN cross-sectional study on Reunion Island.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Pregnancy outcomes of Q fever: prospective follow-up study on Reunion island.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Article
- Management of Coxiella burnetii infection in livestock populations and the associated zoonotic risk: A consensus statement.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018Article
- From Q Fever to Coxiella burnetii Infection: a Paradigm Change.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017Review
- The First Serological Study of Coxiella burnetii among Pregnant Women in Iran.Iranian journal of public health · 2016Article
- Nationwide registry-based ecological analysis of Q fever incidence and pregnancy outcome during an outbreak in the Netherlands.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in women exposed to livestock: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort.Epidemiology and infection · 2014Article
- Adverse pregnancy outcomes and Coxiella burnetii antibodies in pregnant women, Denmark.Emerging infectious diseases · 2014Article
- The role of infection in miscarriage.Human reproduction updateReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQ fever caused by Coxiella burnetii is transmitted to humans by inhalation of aerosols from animal birth products. Q fever in pregnancy is suspected to be a potential cause of fetal and maternal morbidity and fetal mortality but the pathogenesis is poorly understood, and even in Q fever endemic areas, the magnitude of a potential association is not established.We aimed to examine if presence of antibodies to C. burnetii during pregnancy or seroconversion were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
methodsThe Danish National Birth Cohort collected blood samples and interview data from 100,418 pregnant women (1996-2002). We sampled 397 pregnant women with occupational or domestic exposure to cattle or sheep and a random sample of 459 women with no animal exposure. Outcome measures were spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, birth weight and Small for Gestational Age (SGA).Blood samples collected in pregnancy were screened for antibodies against C. burnetii by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Samples positive for IgG or IgM antibodies in the ELISA were confirmed by immunofluorescence antibody test (IFA).
resultsAmong the 856 women, 169 (19.7%) women were IFA positive; 147 (87%) of these had occupational or domestic contact with livestock (IFA cutoff > =1:128).Two abortions were IFA positive vs. 6 IFA negative (OR: 1.5; 95%CI: 0.3-7.6). Three preterm births were IFA positive vs. 38 IFA negative (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-1.1). There was a significant difference in birth weight of 168 g (95% CI: 70-267 g) with IFA positive being heavier, and the risk of being SGA was not increased in the newborns of IFA positive women (OR: 0.4; 95%CI: 0.8-1.0).Most seropositive women were IgG positive indicating previous exposure. Seroconversion during pregnancy was found in 10 women; they all delivered live babies at term, but two were SGA.
conclusionWe found no increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in women with verified exposure to C. burnetii.To our knowledge, this is the first population-based seroepidemiologic study evaluating pregnancy outcome in women with serologically verified exposure to C. burnetii against a comparable reference group of seronegative women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.