Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23413787›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2013

No excess risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with serological markers of previous infection with Coxiella burnetii: evidence from the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Stine Yde Nielsen, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Kåre Mølbak, Niels Henrik Hjøllund, Bjørn Kantsø, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt, Tine Brink Henriksen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence ofNew microbes and new infections · 2025
    Review
  2. Infection and Persistence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. FromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New microbes and new infections · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of infection in miscarriage.Human reproduction update
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stine Yde NielsenDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Gl, Landevej 61, Herning 7400, Denmark. stineyde@dadlnet.dk
Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen
Kåre Mølbak
Niels Henrik Hjøllund
Bjørn Kantsø
Karen Angeliki Krogfelt
Tine Brink Henriksen
Statens Serum Institut · DKRegional Hospital West Jutland · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQ fever caused by Coxiella burnetii is transmitted to humans by inhalation of aerosols from animal birth products. Q fever in pregnancy is suspected to be a potential cause of fetal and maternal morbidity and fetal mortality but the pathogenesis is poorly understood, and even in Q fever endemic areas, the magnitude of a potential association is not established.We aimed to examine if presence of antibodies to C. burnetii during pregnancy or seroconversion were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

methodsThe Danish National Birth Cohort collected blood samples and interview data from 100,418 pregnant women (1996-2002). We sampled 397 pregnant women with occupational or domestic exposure to cattle or sheep and a random sample of 459 women with no animal exposure. Outcome measures were spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, birth weight and Small for Gestational Age (SGA).Blood samples collected in pregnancy were screened for antibodies against C. burnetii by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Samples positive for IgG or IgM antibodies in the ELISA were confirmed by immunofluorescence antibody test (IFA).

resultsAmong the 856 women, 169 (19.7%) women were IFA positive; 147 (87%) of these had occupational or domestic contact with livestock (IFA cutoff > =1:128).Two abortions were IFA positive vs. 6 IFA negative (OR: 1.5; 95%CI: 0.3-7.6). Three preterm births were IFA positive vs. 38 IFA negative (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-1.1). There was a significant difference in birth weight of 168 g (95% CI: 70-267 g) with IFA positive being heavier, and the risk of being SGA was not increased in the newborns of IFA positive women (OR: 0.4; 95%CI: 0.8-1.0).Most seropositive women were IgG positive indicating previous exposure. Seroconversion during pregnancy was found in 10 women; they all delivered live babies at term, but two were SGA.

conclusionWe found no increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in women with verified exposure to C. burnetii.To our knowledge, this is the first population-based seroepidemiologic study evaluating pregnancy outcome in women with serologically verified exposure to C. burnetii against a comparable reference group of seronegative women.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, BacterialBirth WeightCoxiella burnetiiDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeQ FeverYoung AdultAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23413787
PMCPMC3585700
OpenAlexW2087086636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.