ArticleJRSM short reports2013
Retrospective analysis of outcome of women with breast or gynaecological cancer in the intensive care unit.
Article in JRSM short reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill women with gynecologic malignancies: a two-database retrospective study using MIMIC-IV v3.1 and eICU-CRD v2.0.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Time to death from cervical cancer and its predictors in hospitalized patients: a survival approach study in Mato Grosso, Brazil.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical course and outcomes of cancer patients admitted in medical ICU with sepsis.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2023Article
- Scoring systems in critically ill: Which one to use in cancer patients?World journal of critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Development of a model for predicting mortality of breast cancer admitted to Intensive Care Unit.African health sciences · 2022Article
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients requiring intensive care unit admission: a prospective study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018Article
- Are Intensive Cares Worthwhile for Breast Cancer Patients: The Experience of an Oncological ICU.Frontiers in medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAdvances in oncological care have led to improved short and long-term outcomes of female patients with breast and gynecological cancer but little is known about their prognosis when admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim was to describe the epidemiology of patients with women's cancer in ICU.
designRetrospective analysis of data of patients with breast and gynecological cancer in ICU between February 2004 and July 2008.
settingICU in a tertiary referral centre in London.
participantsNineteen critically ill women with breast or gynaecological cancer.
main outcome measuresICU and six-month outcome.
resultsEleven women had breast cancer and eight patients had gynaecological cancer. Twelve patients were known to have metastatic disease. The main reasons for admission to ICU were sepsis (94.7%), respiratory failure (36.8%) and need for vasoactive support (26.3%). ICU mortality was 31.6%. There was no difference in age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on admission to ICU between ICU survivors and non-survivors. During their stay in ICU, non-survivors had significantly more organ failure. Six-month mortality was 68.4%. Four patients had >1 admission to ICU.
conclusionsICU outcome of critically ill women with breast or gynaecological cancer was similar to that of other non-cancer patient cohorts but six-month mortality was significantly higher. The decision to admit patients with women's cancer to the ICU should depend on the severity of the acute illness rather than factors related to the underlying malignancy. More research is needed to explore the outcome of patients with women's cancer after discharge from ICU.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.