Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23413372›Full record

ArticleF1000 biology reports2013

PKM and the maintenance of memory.

David L Glanzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000 biology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attenuation of amyloid-β generation by atypical protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of engulfment adaptor PTB domain containing 1 threonine 35.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. PKMζ Inhibition Disrupts Reconsolidation and Erases Object Recognition Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Molecular Mechanisms of the Memory Trace.Trends in neurosciences · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Atypical PKCs in memory maintenance: the roles of feedback and redundancy.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A biological perspective on memory.Current biology : CB · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David L GlanzmanDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, 90095 USA ; Department of Neurobiology and the Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, CA, 90095 USA ; Integrative Center for Learning and Memory, University of California Los Angeles, CA, 90095 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How can memories outlast the molecules from which they are made? Answers to this fundamental question have been slow coming but are now emerging. A novel kinase, an isoform of protein kinase C (PKC), PKMzeta, has been shown to be critical to the maintenance of some types of memory. Inhibiting the catalytic properties of this kinase can erase well-established memories without altering the ability of the erased synapse to be retrained. This article provides an overview of the literature linking PKMzeta to memory maintenance and identifies some of the controversial issues that surround the bold implications of the existing data. It concludes with a discussion of the future directions of this domain.

Identifiers

PMID23413372
PMCPMC3564217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.