ArticleBMJ quality & safety2013
Systematic simulation-based team training in a Swedish intensive care unit: a diverse response among critical care professions.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of non-technical skills training in intensive care units: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Crew resource management training in healthcare: a systematic review of intervention design, training conditions and evaluation.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- The impact of intraoperative non-technical skills training on scrub practitioners' self-efficacy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Moulage safety practice around the world: a framework for best practice.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- High-fidelity simulation programs in ICU-related ethical non-technical skills training: A narrative review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Review
- The effect of interprofessional education on the work environment of health professionals: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024Article
- Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Comparison of medical students' perceptions of patient safety: Focusing on simulation training using a high-fidelity simulator.PloS one · 2024Article
- Simulation effect on medical sciences students' motivation: A systematic review study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Review
- Article
- All professions can benefit - a mixed-methods study on simulation-based teamwork training for operating room teams.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- Fear of making a mistake: a prominent cause of stress for COVID-19 ICU staff-a mixed-methods study.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Enhancing disaster response of emergency medical teams through "TEAMS 3.0" training package-Does the multidisciplinary intervention make a difference?Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The Influence of Human Factors Training in Air Rescue Service on Patient Safety in Hospitals: Results of an Online Survey.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Using simulation-based training during hospital relocation: a controlled intervention study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2022Article
- Nurses' perception on competency requirement and training demand for intensive care nurses.International journal of nursing sciences · 2022Article
- Hospital Culture and Healthcare Workers' Provision of Patient-Centered Care: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Simulation-based training improves patient safety climate in acute stroke care (STREAM).Neurological research and practice · 2021Article
- Simulation-based team training in time-critical clinical presentations in emergency medicine and critical care: a review of the literature.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2021Article
- Multiprofessional perspectives on the identification of latent safety threats via in situ simulation: a prospective cohort pilot study.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeamwork-that is, collaboration and communication-is an important factor for safe healthcare, but professions perceive the quality of teamwork differently.
objectiveTo examine the relationship between simulation-based team training (SBTT) and different professions' self-efficacy, experienced quality of collaboration and communication, perceptions of teamwork and safety, together with staff turnover.
methodsAll staff (n=151; physicians, nurses and nurse assistants) in an intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital were systematically trained over 2 years. Data on individual self-efficacy were measured using the self-efficacy questionnaire; the experienced quality of collaboration and communication, teamwork climate, safety climate and perception of working conditions were sampled using the ICU version of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ). Staff turnover and sick leave was measured using the hospital's staff administration system for the intervention ICU and a control ICU in the same hospital.
resultsThe perception of safety differed between professions before training. Nurses' and physicians' mean self-efficacy scores improved, and nurse assistants' perceived quality of collaboration and communication with physician specialists improved after training. Nurse assistants' perception of the SAQ factors teamwork climate, safety climate and working conditions were more positive after the project as well as nurses' perception of safety climate. The number of nurses quitting their job and nurse assistants' time on sick leave was reduced in comparison to the control ICU during the study period. LIMITATIONS: Results for SAQ factors must be interpreted with caution given that Cronbach's α and inter-correlations for the SAQ factors showed lower values than benchmarking data.
conclusionsAll team members benefited from the SBTT in an authentic composed team, but this was expressed differently for the respective professions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.