ArticleClinical rheumatology2013
Anti-CCP in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a cross sectional study in Brazilian patients.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the clinical and radiological landscape of rhupus: navigating the challenges in disease classification.Rheumatology international · 2024Review
- Anti-Citrullinated Peptide Antibody Expression and Its Association with Clinical Features and Outcomes in Patients with Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Plasma MicroRNAs (miR-146a, miR-103a, and miR-155) as Potential Biomarkers for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Disease Activity in Iranian Patients.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2021Article
- Latent autoimmunity across disease-specific boundaries in at-risk first-degree relatives of SLE and RA patients.EBioMedicine · 2019Article
- The Micro-RNA Expression Profiles of Autoimmune Arthritis Reveal Novel Biomarkers of the Disease and Therapeutic Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Antibodies against carbamylated proteins and cyclic citrullinated peptides in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from two well-defined European cohorts.Arthritis research & therapy · 2016Article
- Rhupus; unusual presentations.Clinical rheumatology · 2015Article
- Mining disease risk patterns from nationwide clinical databases for the assessment of early rheumatoid arthritis risk.PloS one · 2015Article
- Breaking immunological tolerance in systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2014Review
- Rhupus syndrome and Chiari's network.Journal of family medicine and primary careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, it has been found that some lupus patients may have anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), although the clinical significance of such finding is not well established. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients may have joint complaints that are very similar to those observed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In early stages of disease, this form of arthritis can be difficult to differentiate from RA, so it is not rare that some SLE patients are initially misdiagnosed to have this disease. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of anti-CCP in SLE patients from Southern Brazil and its association with clinical and serological profiles. One hundred nine SLE patients were studied for anti-CCP and compared with data of 156 RA patients and 100 healthy volunteers. Comparison of clinical and autoantibody profile of anti-CCP-positive and anti-CCP-negative SLE patients was done. All SLE patients positive of anti-CCP were submitted to hand and feet X-rays. Anti-CCP was positive in 15 of 109 SLE patients, and one of them had confirmed the diagnosis of rhupus. This prevalence was significantly higher than in healthy controls (p = 0.0004) and lower than in RA patients (p < 0.0001). No relationship could be found with clinical profile, including joint complaints. SLE patients with anti-CCP had higher prevalence of anti-Ro (p = 0.02) and anti-La (p = 0.004) autoantibodies, in comparison with those negative to anti-CCP. We found that 13.7% of Brazilian patients with SLE have positive anti-CCP. Patients with anti-CCP showed higher prevalence of anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibodies than those negative for anti-CCP. Only a careful and prolonged follow-up will reveal the real clinical value of these markers in each patient individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.