Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23412545›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2012

A Heritable Recombination system for synthetic Darwinian evolution in yeast.

Dante W Romanini, Pamela Peralta-Yahya, Vanessa Mondol, Virginia W Cornish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution and synthetic biology.Current opinion in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Towards an engineering theory of evolution.Nature communications · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Probing pathways of adaptation with continuous evolution.Current opinion in systems biology · 2019
    Article
  6. In vivo biosensors: mechanisms, development, and applications.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  7. Modern methods for laboratory diversification of biomolecules.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Methods for the directed evolution of proteins.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015
    Review
  13. In vivo continuous directed evolution.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2015
    Review
  14. Molecular tools for chemical biotechnology.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dante W RomaniniDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Pamela Peralta-Yahya
Vanessa Mondol
Virginia W Cornish

Funding

A Genetic Screen for Protein Evolution and ProteomicsR01GM062867 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI CORNISH, VIRGINIA W · 2002 to 2010
$2.8M
DNA Assembly via Reiterative RecombinationR01GM096064 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI CORNISH, VIRGINIA W · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
Entirely in vivo enzyme evolution and engineering of Cre recombinaseF32GM089031 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ROMANINI, DANTE WILLIAM · 2009 to 2011
$124k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM089031NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM089031NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062867NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096064NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM096064NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM62867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic recombination is central to the generation of molecular diversity and enhancement of evolutionary fitness in living systems. Methods such as DNA shuffling that recapitulate this diversity mechanism in vitro are powerful tools for engineering biomolecules with useful new functions by directed evolution. Synthetic biology now brings demand for analogous technologies that enable the controlled recombination of beneficial mutations in living cells. Thus, here we create a Heritable Recombination system centered around a library cassette plasmid that enables inducible mutagenesis via homologous recombination and subsequent combination of beneficial mutations through sexual reproduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using repair of nonsense codons in auxotrophic markers as a model, Heritable Recombination was optimized to give mutagenesis efficiencies of up to 6% and to allow successive repair of different markers through two cycles of sexual reproduction and recombination. Finally, Heritable Recombination was employed to change the substrate specificity of a biosynthetic enzyme, with beneficial mutations in three different active site loops crossed over three continuous rounds of mutation and selection to cover a total sequence diversity of 10(13). Heritable Recombination, while at an early stage of development, breaks the transformation barrier to library size and can be immediately applied to combinatorial crossing of beneficial mutations for cell engineering, adding important features to the growing arsenal of next generation molecular biology tools for synthetic biology.

Indexed as

MutagenesisRecombination, GeneticBiological EvolutionBiomarkersDNA ShufflingMutationPlasmidsReproductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23412545
PMCPMC3569010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.