Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23412423›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2013

What is the clinical value of cancer stem cell markers in gliomas?

Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot, Simon Kjær Hermansen, Steinbjørn Hansen, Bjarne Winther Kristensen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Differential expression of stem cell markers in proliferating cells in glioma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Podoplanin in Inflammation and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rikke Hedegaard DahlrotDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital Odense, Denmark .
Simon Kjær Hermansen
Steinbjørn Hansen
Bjarne Winther Kristensen
Kongsberg Innovasjon (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent data indicate that cancer stem cells (CSCs) are responsible for resistance of glioblastomas to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, thereby contributing to the poor survival of these patients. In order to identify novel prognostic markers in gliomas, several CSC markers have been investigated. This review summarizes current reports on putative glioma CSC markers and reviews the prognostic value of the individual immunohistochemical markers reported in the literature. Using the Pubmed database, twenty-seven CSC studies looking at membrane markers (CD133, podoplanin, CD15, and A2B5), filament markers (nestin), RNA-binding proteins (Musashi-1) and transcription factors (BMI1, SOX2, Id1 and Oct-4) qualified for this review. The level of CD133 and nestin increased with increasing malignancy grade, and for both markers a prognostic significance was identified in the majority of the studies. Moreover, the co-expression of CD133 and nestin was shown to have an even more powerful prognostic value than just single markers. Regarding podoplanin and Musashi-1, there was a trend towards a prognostic value when summarizing all studies. Especially the co-expression of Musashi-1 and MIB1 seemed promising. For the remaining markers CD15, A2B5, BMI1, SOX2, Id1 and Oct4, no prognostic value was found regarding overall survival in this review. In conclusion we find that CD133, nestin, CD133/nestin, podoplanin, Musashi-1 and Musashi-1/MIB1 are the most promising markers for future investigation. Evaluation in larger cohorts with known clinical data and known status of important biomarkers like MGMT and IDH1 is necessary to reveal their full clinical potential.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCell MembraneGliomaGlycoproteinsHumansIntermediate Filament ProteinsNeoplastic Stem CellsNerve Tissue ProteinsNestinPeptidesPrognosisPubMedSurvival RateAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorGlycoproteinsIntermediate Filament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNES protein, humanNestinPeptidesPROM1 protein, humancancer stem cellCD133Gliomaimmunohistochemistrynestinprognosis

Identifiers

PMID23412423
PMCPMC3563206
OpenAlexW1499841120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.