Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23411577›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2013

Biomarkers in sepsis.

Mervyn Singer

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03606382 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Collection of Clinical Specimens From Volunteers for Assay Development

TypeobservationalSponsorInflammatixRan2018 to 2019Enrolled6ConditionsAcute Respiratory InfectionArmsHostDx Fever Test, HostDx Sepsis Test
NCT04094818 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

TriVerity in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Infections and Suspected Sepsis

TypeobservationalSponsorInflammatixRan2020 to 2024Enrolled1,441ConditionsRespiratory Tract Infections, Urinary Tract Infections, Intra-Abdominal Infections, Skin and Soft Tissue InfectionArmsTriVerity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Pentraxin 3 in patients with severe sepsis or shock: the ALBIOS trial.European journal of clinical investigation · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Metabolomics: Applications and Promise in Mycobacterial Disease.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mervyn SingerUniversity College London, London, UK. m.singer@ucl.ac.uk

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review discusses the current developments in biomarkers for sepsis. RECENT

findingsWith quantum leaps in technology, an array of biomarkers will become available within the next decade as point-of-care tools that will likely revolutionize the management of sepsis. These markers will facilitate early and accurate diagnosis, faster recognition of impending organ dysfunction, optimal selection and titration of appropriate therapies, and more reliable prognostication of risk and outcome. These diagnostics will also enable an improved characterization of the biological phenotype underlying sepsis and thus a better appreciation of the condition. SUMMARY: The potential for novel biomarkers in sepsis will need to be properly realized with considerable funding, academic-industry collaborations, appropriate investigations and validation in heterogenous populations, but these developments do hold the capacity to transform patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisBiomarkersHumansMultiple Organ FailurePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRiskSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23411577
PMCPMC4222798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.