Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23411475›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2013

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and female fertility.

Ken R Smith, Heidi A Hanson, Michael S Hollingshaus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. NAR cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Evolutionary Origin of HumanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A global perspective on the ethnic-specificJournal of the National Cancer Center · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. HumanLife science alliance · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Peto's paradox and the hallmarks of cancer: constructing an evolutionary framework for understanding the incidence of cancer.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ken R SmithDepartment of Family and Consumer Studies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, USA. ken.smith@fcs.utah.edu
Heidi A Hanson
Michael S Hollingshaus
University of Utah · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · US

Funding

The Utah Study of Fertility, Longevity and AgingR01AG022095 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SMITH, KEN R · 2003 to 2015
$9.4M
NIA NIH HHS AG022095NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review recent publications examining BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and their relationship with female fertility. RECENT

findingsEight relevant studies of female fertility, five of which were published since January 2010 and the remainder in the preceding decade. Several mechanisms suggest that reproduction will be adversely affected among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with one study finding lower oocyte production, another reporting fewer births, and a third showing lower rates of pregnancies. Four articles reported no significant difference in the number of children ever born between carriers and noncarriers whereas a 2012 study showed elevated natural fertility among mutation carriers. SUMMARY: This review shows that for most articles there are adverse or no fertility effects of being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier. When no differences were detected for children-ever-born, those studies relied on current populations in which women had access to contraception. The sole analysis reporting elevated fertility was based on an historic population in which family planning methods were unavailable. Predictions that BRCA1/2 mutations adversely affect embryogenesis and genome integrity were not supported. The idea that BRCA1/2 mutations have antagonistic pleiotropic effects (enhancing fertility while reducing survival) was supported in the natural fertility study.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2MutationBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic PleiotropyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeterozygoteHumansInfertility, FemaleOocytesOvarian NeoplasmsPregnancyPregnancy RateRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23411475
PMCPMC4010322
OpenAlexW2057872734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.