Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23411442›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2013

In vivo vibrometry inside the apex of the mouse cochlea using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Simon S Gao, Patrick D Raphael, Rosalie Wang, Jesung Park, Anping Xia, Brian E Applegate, John S Oghalai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tuned vibration modes in a miniature hearing organ: Insights from the bushcricket.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biomedical optics express · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Osmotic stabilization prevents cochlear synaptopathy after blast trauma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon S GaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, 801 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA ; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Patrick D Raphael
Rosalie Wang
Jesung Park
Anping Xia
Brian E Applegate
John S Oghalai

Funding

Modulation of Cochlear TuningK08DC006671 · NIDCD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI OGHALAI, JOHN S · 2004 to 2008
$839k
NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC006671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sound transduction within the auditory portion of the inner ear, the cochlea, is a complex nonlinear process. The study of cochlear mechanics in large rodents has provided important insights into cochlear function. However, technological and experimental limitations have restricted studies in mice due to their smaller cochlea. These challenges are important to overcome because of the wide variety of transgenic mouse strains with hearing loss mutations that are available for study. To accomplish this goal, we used spectral domain optical coherence tomography to visualize and measure sound-induced vibrations of intracochlear tissues. We present, to our knowledge, the first vibration measurements from the apex of an unopened mouse cochlea.

Indexed as

(170.4500) Optical coherence tomography(170.4940) Otolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID23411442
PMCPMC3567710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.