Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23411027›Full record

ArticleGut2013

Label-retaining liver cancer cells are relatively resistant to sorafenib.

Hong-Wu Xin, Chenwi M Ambe, Danielle M Hari, Gordon W Wiegand, Tyler C Miller, Jin-Qiu Chen, Andrew J Anderson, Satyajit Ray, John E Mullinax, Tomotake Koizumi and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microvesicles: the functional mediators in sorafenib resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Wu XinSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Chenwi M Ambe
Danielle M Hari
Gordon W Wiegand
Tyler C Miller
Jin-Qiu Chen
Andrew J Anderson
Satyajit Ray
John E Mullinax
Tomotake Koizumi
Russell C Langan
Douglas Burka
Michelle A Herrmann
Paul K Goldsmith
Alexander Stojadinovic
Udo Rudloff
Snorri S Thorgeirsson
Itzhak Avital
National Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Preclinical drug development in pancreatic cancerZIABC011267 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RUDLOFF, UDO · 2010 to 2025
$23.9M
Spatial Imaging Technology ResourceZICBC011434 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MALIK, MARIAM · 2012 to 2025
$12.8M
Cancer stem cells and human liver cancerZIABC011031 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI THORGEIRSSON, SNORRI · 2009 to 2014
$3.7M
Isolation and Purification of Cancer Stem Cells Based on Functional ApproachesZIABC011005 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI AVITAL, ITZHAK · 2009 to 2012
$932k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe standard therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sorafenib, with most patients experiencing disease progression within 6 months. Label-retaining cancer cells (LRCC) represent a novel subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSC). The objective was to test whether LRCC are resistant to sorafenib.

methodsWe tested human HCC derived LRCC and non-LRCC before and after treatment with sorafenib.

resultsLRCC derived from human HCC are relatively resistant to sorafenib. The proportion of LRCC in HCC cell lines is increased after sorafenib while the general population of cancer cells undergoes growth suppression. We show that LRCC demonstrate improved viability and toxicity profiles, and reduced apoptosis, over non-LRCC. We show that after treatment with sorafenib, LRCC upregulate the CSC marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, wingless-type MMTV-integration-site family, cell survival and proliferation genes, and downregulate apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, cell adhesion and stem cells differentiation genes. This phenomenon was accompanied by non-uniform activation of specific isoforms of the sorafenib target proteins extracellular-signal-regulated kinases and v-akt-murine-thymoma-viral-oncogene homologue (AKT) in LRCC but not in non-LRCC. A molecular pathway map for sorafenib treated LRCC is proposed.

conclusionsOur results suggest that HCC derived LRCC are relatively resistant to sorafenib. Since LRCC can generate tumours with as few as 10 cells, our data suggest a potential role for these cells in disease recurrence. Further investigation of this phenomenon might provide novel insights into cancer biology, cancer recurrence and drug resistance with important implications for the development of novel cancer therapies based on targeting LRCC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesGene Expression ProfilingHumansLiver NeoplasmsNiacinamideOncogene Protein v-aktPhenylurea CompoundsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSorafenibStem CellsAntineoplastic AgentsExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesNiacinamideOncogene Protein v-aktPhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibCancerCell ProliferationDrug ResistanceHepatocellular CarcinomaStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID23411027
PMCPMC6993136
OpenAlexW2141336152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.