Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23410889›Full record

Trial reportTuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)2013

Lessons learnt from the first efficacy trial of a new infant tuberculosis vaccine since BCG.

Michele Tameris, Helen McShane, J Bruce McClain, Bernard Landry, Stephen Lockhart, Angelique K K Luabeya, Hennie Geldenhuys, Jacqui Shea, Gregory Hussey, Linda van der Merwe and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00953927 (Phase II Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Evaluation of MVA85A/AERAS-485 for Safety, Immunogenicity and Prevention of Tuberculosis in BCG-vaccinated, HIV-negative Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00953927 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Evaluation of MVA85A/AERAS-485 for Safety, Immunogenicity and Prevention of Tuberculosis in BCG-vaccinated, HIV-negative Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorAerasRan2009Enrolled2,797ConditionsTuberculosisArmsMVA85A/AERAS-485, Candida Skin Test Antigen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Tuberculosis susceptibility and protection in children.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Drug-resistant TB: deadly, costly and in need of a vaccine.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michele TamerisSouth African TB Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IIDMM) and School of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Brewelskloof Hospital, Haarlem Street, Worcester, Western Cape 6850, South Africa. michele.tameris@uct.ac.za
Helen McShane
J Bruce McClain
Bernard Landry
Stephen Lockhart
Angelique K K Luabeya
Hennie Geldenhuys
Jacqui Shea
Gregory Hussey
Linda van der Merwe
Marwou de Kock
Thomas Scriba
Robert Walker
Willem Hanekom
Mark Hatherill
Hassan Mahomed
University of Cape Town · ZAAeras · USSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative · ZAJenner Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew tuberculosis (TB) vaccines are being developed to combat the global epidemic. A phase IIb trial of a candidate vaccine, MVA85A, was conducted in a high burden setting in South Africa to evaluate proof-of-concept efficacy for prevention of TB in infants.

objectiveTo describe the study design and implementation lessons from an infant TB vaccine efficacy trial.

methodsThis was a randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of MVA85A to Candin control administered to 4-6-month-old, BCG-vaccinated, HIV-negative infants at a rural site in South Africa. Infants were followed up for 15-39 months for incident TB disease based on pre-specified endpoints.

results2797 infants were enrolled over 22 months. Factors adversely affecting recruitment and the solutions that were implemented are discussed. Slow case accrual led to six months extension of trial follow up.

conclusionThe clinical, regulatory and research environment for modern efficacy trials of new TB vaccines are substantially different to that when BCG vaccine was first evaluated in infants. Future infant TB vaccine trials will need to allocate sufficient resources and optimise operational efficiency. A stringent TB case definition is necessary to maximize specificity, and TB case accrual must be monitored closely.

Indexed as

Tuberculosis VaccinesViral VaccinesBCG VaccineDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantPatient SelectionResearch DesignSouth AfricaTreatment OutcomeTuberculosisVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNABCG VaccineMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23410889
PMCPMC3608032
OpenAlexW1977049359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.