ArticleGenome research2013
Breakpoint profiling of 64 cancer genomes reveals numerous complex rearrangements spawned by homology-independent mechanisms.
Article in Genome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reconstructing the molecular life history of gliomas.Acta neuropathologica · 2018Pooled it
- Severus detects somatic structural variation and complex rearrangements in cancer genomes using long-read sequencing.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Late steps of allelic break-induced replication suppress tandem duplication associated with BRCA1 deficiency.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Fusion of tumor cells and mesenchymal stem/stroma cells: a source of tumor heterogeneity, evolution and recurrence.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Chromothripsis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Boveri and beyond: Chromothripsis and genomic instability from mitotic errors.Molecular cell · 2024Review
- Most large structural variants in cancer genomes can be detected without long reads.Nature genetics · 2023Article
- Small extrachromosomal circular DNA harboring targeted tumor suppressor gene mutations supports intratumor heterogeneity in mouse liver cancer induced by multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9.Genome medicine · 2023Article
- Breakpoints in complex chromosomal rearrangements correspond to transposase-accessible regions of DNA from mature sperm.Human genetics · 2023Article
- The APE2 nuclease is essential for DNA double-strand break repair by microhomology-mediated end joining.Molecular cell · 2023Article
- Double-checking chromosome segregation.The Journal of cell biology · 2023Review
- Evolutionary dynamics in Barrett oesophagus: implications for surveillance, risk stratification and therapy.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
- Mako: A Graph-based Pattern Growth Approach to Detect Complex Structural Variants.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
- svaRetro and svaNUMT: modular packages for annotating retrotransposed transcripts and nuclear integration of mitochondrial DNA in genome sequencing data.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022Article
- Review
- MSH2-deficient prostate tumours have a distinct immune response and clinical outcome compared to MSH2-deficient colorectal or endometrial cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Article
- Focal amplifications are associated with chromothripsis events and diverse prognoses in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Cancer evolution: Darwin and beyond.The EMBO journal · 2021Review
- Gene Duplication and Gene Fusion Are Important Drivers of Tumourigenesis during Cancer Evolution.Genes · 2021Review
- The early evolutionary landscape of osteosarcoma provides clues for targeted treatment strategies.The Journal of pathology · 2021Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor genomes are generally thought to evolve through a gradual accumulation of mutations, but the observation that extraordinarily complex rearrangements can arise through single mutational events suggests that evolution may be accelerated by punctuated changes in genome architecture. To assess the prevalence and origins of complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs), we mapped 6179 somatic structural variation breakpoints in 64 cancer genomes from seven tumor types and screened for clusters of three or more interconnected breakpoints. We find that complex breakpoint clusters are extremely common: 154 clusters comprise 25% of all somatic breakpoints, and 75% of tumors exhibit at least one complex cluster. Based on copy number state profiling, 63% of breakpoint clusters are consistent with being CGRs that arose through a single mutational event. CGRs have diverse architectures including focal breakpoint clusters, large-scale rearrangements joining clusters from one or more chromosomes, and staggeringly complex chromothripsis events. Notably, chromothripsis has a significantly higher incidence in glioblastoma samples (39%) relative to other tumor types (9%). Chromothripsis breakpoints also show significantly elevated intra-tumor allele frequencies relative to simple SVs, which indicates that they arise early during tumorigenesis or confer selective advantage. Finally, assembly and analysis of 4002 somatic and 6982 germline breakpoint sequences reveal that somatic breakpoints show significantly less microhomology and fewer templated insertions than germline breakpoints, and this effect is stronger at CGRs than at simple variants. These results are inconsistent with replication-based models of CGR genesis and strongly argue that nonhomologous repair of concurrently arising DNA double-strand breaks is the predominant mechanism underlying complex cancer genome rearrangements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.