Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23410887›Full record

ArticleGenome research2013

Breakpoint profiling of 64 cancer genomes reveals numerous complex rearrangements spawned by homology-independent mechanisms.

Ankit Malhotra, Michael Lindberg, Gregory G Faust, Mitchell L Leibowitz, Royden A Clark, Ryan M Layer, Aaron R Quinlan, Ira M Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Chromothripsis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Double-checking chromosome segregation.The Journal of cell biology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancer evolution: Darwin and beyond.The EMBO journal · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ankit MalhotraDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, USA.
Michael Lindberg
Gregory G Faust
Mitchell L Leibowitz
Royden A Clark
Ryan M Layer
Aaron R Quinlan
Ira M Hall

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
TRAINING IN CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM008136 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI STUKENBERG, P. TODD · 1985 to 2020
$8.5M
New algorithms and tools for large-scale genomic analysesR01HG006693 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI QUINLAN, AARON R · 2012 to 2018
$3.1M
Extent, Origin, and Control of Structural Variation in Mammalian GenomesDP2OD006493 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HALL, IRA M · 2009 to 2009
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01HG006693-01NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006693NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008136NIH HHS DP2 OD006493NIH HHS DP2OD006493-01Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor genomes are generally thought to evolve through a gradual accumulation of mutations, but the observation that extraordinarily complex rearrangements can arise through single mutational events suggests that evolution may be accelerated by punctuated changes in genome architecture. To assess the prevalence and origins of complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs), we mapped 6179 somatic structural variation breakpoints in 64 cancer genomes from seven tumor types and screened for clusters of three or more interconnected breakpoints. We find that complex breakpoint clusters are extremely common: 154 clusters comprise 25% of all somatic breakpoints, and 75% of tumors exhibit at least one complex cluster. Based on copy number state profiling, 63% of breakpoint clusters are consistent with being CGRs that arose through a single mutational event. CGRs have diverse architectures including focal breakpoint clusters, large-scale rearrangements joining clusters from one or more chromosomes, and staggeringly complex chromothripsis events. Notably, chromothripsis has a significantly higher incidence in glioblastoma samples (39%) relative to other tumor types (9%). Chromothripsis breakpoints also show significantly elevated intra-tumor allele frequencies relative to simple SVs, which indicates that they arise early during tumorigenesis or confer selective advantage. Finally, assembly and analysis of 4002 somatic and 6982 germline breakpoint sequences reveal that somatic breakpoints show significantly less microhomology and fewer templated insertions than germline breakpoints, and this effect is stronger at CGRs than at simple variants. These results are inconsistent with replication-based models of CGR genesis and strongly argue that nonhomologous repair of concurrently arising DNA double-strand breaks is the predominant mechanism underlying complex cancer genome rearrangements.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosome BreakpointsBase SequenceDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA ReplicationGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23410887
PMCPMC3638133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.