Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23409835›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2013

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance with an MR compatible pacemaker.

Anita R Bhandiwad, Kristopher W Cummings, Michael Crowley, Pamela K Woodard

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-contrast-enhanced TMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pacing and Defibrillators in Complex Congenital Heart Disease.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2016
    Article
  5. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2014.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2015
    Review
  6. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita R BhandiwadDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 1020 N, Mason Road, Suite 100, Saint Louis, MO 63141, USA. abhandiw@dom.wustl.edu
Kristopher W Cummings
Michael Crowley
Pamela K Woodard
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within FDA guidelines for the MRI-conditional pacemaker precludes placing the heart at the center of the magnet's bore. This in effect appears to preclude cardiovascular MR. In this manuscript, we describe a protocol for cardiovascular MR of patients with a Revo pacemaker system while operating within FDA guidelines, and the first US case of cardiovascular MR in a patient with a Revo MRI-conditional pacing system despite position constraints.

Indexed as

Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePacemaker, ArtificialAdultEquipment DesignFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID23409835
PMCPMC3579751
OpenAlexW2147990245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.