ArticleMonash bioethics review2012
Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis.
Article in Monash bioethics review, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2018Pooled it
- Modular Ontologies for Genetically Modified People and their Bioethical Implications.Nanoethics · 2024Article
- Public attitudes in Japan toward the creation and use of gametes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells.Future science OA · 2021Article
- Public attitudes in Japan toward the reproductive use of gametes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells.Future science OA · 2021Article
- Review
- Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2020Article
- Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2020Article
- Drawing the line on in vitro gametogenesis.Bioethics · 2020Article
- Germline gene editing and the precautionary principle.Bioethics · 2020Article
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.Journal of medical ethics · 2019Article
- Looking into the shadow: the eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices.Monash bioethics review · 2018Article
- The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos.Protein & cell · 2015Article
- Multiplex parenting: IVG and the generations to come.Journal of medical ethics · 2014Article
- Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.