ArticlePloS one2013
Oncodrive-CIS: a method to reveal likely driver genes based on the impact of their copy number changes on expression.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sparse canonical correlation to identify breast cancer related genes regulated by copy number aberrations.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- A review on multi-omics integration for aiding study design of large scale TCGA cancer datasets.BMC genomics · 2025Review
- Identifying genes associated with disease outcomes using joint sparse canonical correlation analysis-An application in renal clear cell carcinoma.Genetic epidemiology · 2024Article
- CiberAMP: AnBiology · 2022Article
- A comparative study of multi-omics integration tools for cancer driver gene identification and tumour subtyping.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Tumour-specific Causal Inference Discovers Distinct Disease Mechanisms Underlying Cancer Subtypes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Chasing the FOXO3: Insights into Its New Mitochondrial Lair in Colorectal Cancer Landscape.Cancers · 2019Review
- Decoding Somatic Driver Gene Mutations and Affected Signaling Pathways in Human Medulloblastoma Subgroups.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- Algorithmic methods to infer the evolutionary trajectories in cancer progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Somatic gene copy number alterations in colorectal cancer: new quest for cancer drivers and biomarkers.Oncogene · 2016Review
- The mini-driver model of polygenic cancer evolution.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015Review
- Pan-cancer network analysis identifies combinations of rare somatic mutations across pathways and protein complexes.Nature genetics · 2015Article
- Article
- Expanding the computational toolbox for mining cancer genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014Review
- Principles and methods of integrative genomic analyses in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2014Review
- Collection, integration and analysis of cancer genomic profiles: from data to insight.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014Review
- Comprehensive identification of mutational cancer driver genes across 12 tumor types.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Visualizing multidimensional cancer genomics data.Genome medicine · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A well-established approach for detecting genes involved in tumorigenesis due to copy number alterations (CNAs) is to assess the recurrence of the alteration across multiple samples. Expression data can be used to filter this list of candidates by assessing whether the gene expression significantly differs between tumors depending on the copy number status. A drawback of this approach is that it may fail to detect low-recurrent drivers. Furthermore, this analysis does not provide information about expression changes for each gene as compared to the whole data set and does not take into consideration the expression of normal samples. Here we describe a novel method (Oncodrive-CIS) aimed at ranking genes according to the expression impact caused by the CNAs. The rationale of Oncodrive-CIS is based on the hypothesis that genes involved in cancer due to copy number changes are more biased towards misregulation than are bystanders. Moreover, to gain insight into the expression changes caused by gene dosage, the expression of samples with CNAs is compared to that of tumor samples with diploid genotype and also to that of normal samples. Oncodrive-CIS demonstrated better performance in detecting putative associations between copy-number and expression in simulated data sets as compared to other methods aimed to this purpose, and picked up genes likely to be related with tumorigenesis when applied to real cancer samples. In summary, Oncodrive-CIS provides a statistical framework to evaluate the in cis effect of CNAs that may be useful to elucidate the role of these aberrations in driving oncogenesis. An implementation of this method and the corresponding user guide are freely available at http://bg.upf.edu/oncodrivecis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.