ArticleAvicenna journal of medical biotechnology2011
Genetically modified foods and social concerns.
Article in Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overexpression and Characterization of L-Lactate Dehydrogenase fromFood science of animal resources · 2025Article
- Proteomic analysis of differential responses to norflurazon herbicide in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- What do popular YouTube videos say about genetically modified foods? A content analysis.Dialogues in health · 2023Article
- Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Three Parts of the Plant Genome: On the Way to Success in the Production of Recombinant Proteins.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Does China have a public debate on genetically modified organisms? A discourse network analysis of public debate on Weibo.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2022Article
- Genetically Modified Soybean Detection Using a Biosensor Electrode with a Self-Assembled Monolayer of Gold Nanoparticles.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Genetic Manipulation and Bioreactor Culture of Plants as a Tool for Industry and Its Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Molecular Mechanisms and Biochemical Pathways for Micronutrient Acquisition and Storage in Legumes to Support Biofortification for Nutritional Security.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Social Risk Perceptions of Genetically Modified Foods of Engineers in Training: Application of a Comprehensive Risk Model.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Review
- Plant-associated and soil microbiota composition as a novel criterion for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants.GM crops & food · 2020Article
- Multiplex quantitative PCR for single-reaction genetically modified (GM) plant detection and identification of false-positive GM plants linked to Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) infection.BMC biotechnology · 2019Article
- Recent advancement on chemical arsenal of3 Biotech · 2018Review
- A bioinformatics approach for identifying transgene insertion sites using whole genome sequencing data.BMC biotechnology · 2017Article
- Expression of Shigella flexneri ipaB Gene in Tobacco.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biotechnology is providing us with a wide range of options for how we can use agricultural and commercial forestry lands. The cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops on millions of hectares of lands and their injection into our food chain is a huge global genetic experiment involving all living beings. Considering the fast pace of new advances in production of genetically modified crops, consumers, farmers and policymakers worldwide are challenged to reach a consensus on a clear vision for the future of world food supply. The current food biotechnology debate illustrates the serious conflict between two groups: 1) Agri-biotech investors and their affiliated scientists who consider agricultural biotechnology as a solution to food shortage, the scarcity of environmental resources and weeds and pests infestations; and 2) independent scientists, environmentalists, farmers and consumers who warn that genetically modified food introduces new risks to food security, the environment and human health such as loss of biodiversity; the emergence of superweeds and superpests; the increase of antibiotic resistance, food allergies and other unintended effects. This article reviews major viewpoints which are currently debated in the food biotechnology sector in the world. It also lays the ground-work for deep debate on benefits and risks of Biotech-crops for human health, ecosystems and biodiversity. In this context, although some regulations exist, there is a need for continuous vigilance for all countries involved in producing genetically engineered food to follow the international scientific bio-safety testing guidelines containing reliable pre-release experiments and post-release track of transgenic plants to protect public health and avoid future environmental harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23408723PMC3558185W2122428277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.