ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Outbreak investigation using high-throughput genome sequencing within a diagnostic microbiology laboratory.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of antimicrobial resistance via state-of-the-art technologies versus conventional methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Successful management of a multi-species outbreak of carbapenem-resistant organisms in Fiji: a prospective genomics-enhanced investigation and response.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Current and Future Technologies for the Detection of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Early detection of a possible multidrug-resistantIranian journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Using a combination of short- and long-read sequencing to investigate the diversity in plasmid- and chromosomally encoded extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in clinicalMicrobial genomics · 2023Article
- Metagenomic Sequencing for the Diagnosis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Next-generation sequencing and PCR technologies in monitoring the hospital microbiome and its drug resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Antimicrobials from Seaweeds for Food Applications.Marine drugs · 2021Review
- Advantages and Limitations of 16S rRNA Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Identification in the Diagnostic Microbiology Laboratory: Perspectives from a Middle-Income Country.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Global knowledge gaps in acute febrile illness etiologic investigations: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
- Recent trends in molecular diagnostics of yeast infections: from PCR to NGS.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Article
- Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: A 2018 Snapshot.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2018Review
- Review
- Genomic and transcriptomic comparison between Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with high and low within herd prevalence of intra-mammary infection.BMC microbiology · 2017Article
- Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in CSF from Three Patients with Meningoencephalitis by Next-Generation Sequencing.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2016Article
- Genotyping Influenza Virus by Next-Generation Deep Sequencing in Clinical Specimens.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2016Article
- SuperPhy: predictive genomics for the bacterial pathogen Escherichia coli.BMC microbiology · 2016Article
- Detection of virus in CSF from the cases with meningoencephalitis by next-generation sequencing.Journal of neurovirology · 2016Article
- Utility of Whole-Genome Sequencing in Characterizing Acinetobacter Epidemiology and Analyzing Hospital Outbreaks.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of bacterial genomes has recently become more accessible and is now available to the routine diagnostic microbiology laboratory. However, questions remain regarding its feasibility, particularly with respect to data analysis in nonspecialist centers. To test the applicability of NGS to outbreak investigations, Ion Torrent sequencing was used to investigate a putative multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli outbreak in the neonatal unit of the Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia. Four suspected outbreak strains and a comparator strain were sequenced. Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis demonstrated that the four neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) strains were identical and easily differentiated from the comparator strain. Genome sequence data also determined that the NICU strains belonged to multilocus sequence type 131 and carried the bla(CTX-M-15) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. Comparison of the outbreak strains to all publicly available complete E. coli genome sequences showed that they clustered with neonatal meningitis and uropathogenic isolates. The turnaround time from a positive culture to the completion of sequencing (prior to data analysis) was 5 days, and the cost was approximately $300 per strain (for the reagents only). The main obstacles to a mainstream adoption of NGS technologies in diagnostic microbiology laboratories are currently cost (although this is decreasing), a paucity of user-friendly and clinically focused bioinformatics platforms, and a lack of genomics expertise outside the research environment. Despite these hurdles, NGS technologies provide unparalleled high-resolution genotyping in a short time frame and are likely to be widely implemented in the field of diagnostic microbiology in the next few years, particularly for epidemiological investigations (replacing current typing methods) and the characterization of resistance determinants. Clinical microbiologists need to familiarize themselves with these technologies and their applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.