Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23408541›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2013

Comparative anatomy of mouse and human nail units.

Philip Fleckman, Karin Jaeger, Kathleen A Silva, John P Sundberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The development of hair follicles and nail.Developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip FleckmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, DC 98195-6524, USA.
Karin Jaeger
Kathleen A Silva
John P Sundberg
Jackson Laboratory · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Cpdm: Cloning a Gene That Regulates Eosinophil FunctionR01AR049288 · NIAMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BOWCOCK, ANNE MARY, HOGENESCH, HARM · 2004 to 2016
$5.9M
ROLES OF HOX GENES IN SKIN &HAIR FOLLICLE DEVELOPMENTR01AR047204 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI AWGULEWITSCH, ALEXANDER · 2000 to 2010
$2.2M
Genetics of Alopecia Areata in the C3H/HeJ MouseR01AR056635 · NIAMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI SUNDBERG, JOHN PAUL · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Novel Mouse Model for Junctional Epidermolysis BullosaR21AR054407 · NIAMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI SUNDBERG, JOHN PAUL · 2010 to 2011
$437k
Pathology of Mouse Models of Human DiseaseR13OD010920 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI SUNDBERG, JOHN PAUL · 2012 to 2021
$200k
NCI NIH HHS CA34196NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIAMS NIH HHS AR047204NIAMS NIH HHS AR054407NIAMS NIH HHS AR056635NIAMS NIH HHS AR49288NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047204NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR049288NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056635NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR054407NIH HHS OD010920NIH HHS R13 OD010920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of mice with hair defects have resulted in major contributions to the understanding of hair disorders. To use mouse models as a tool to study nail diseases, a basic understanding of the similarities and differences between the human and mouse nail unit is required. In this study we compare the human and mouse nail unit at the macroscopic and microscopic level and use immunohistochemistry to determine the keratin expression patterns in the mouse nail unit. Both species have a proximal nail fold, cuticle, nail matrix, nail bed, nail plate, and hyponychium. Distinguishing features are the shape of the nail and the presence of an extended hyponychium in the mouse. Expression patterns of most keratins are similar. These findings indicate that the mouse nail unit shares major characteristics with the human nail unit and overall represents a very similar structure, useful for the investigation of nail diseases and nail biology.

Indexed as

Anatomy, ComparativeAnimalsBiomarkersDissectionFemaleHoof and ClawHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNailsPostureSpecies SpecificityBiomarkersKeratins

Identifiers

PMID23408541
PMCPMC3579226
OpenAlexW1702592964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.