Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23407991›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2013

Multiple opportunities to reduce radiation dose from myocardial perfusion imaging.

Andrew J Einstein

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning to predict abnormal myocardial perfusion from pre-test features.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  4. The next step in standardizing SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Hepatic radiotracer: Still difficult to suppress?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The very hungry caterpillar and the ongoing effort to reduce radiation in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: Have we become the beautiful butterfly?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Patient-specific activity or scan-time in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: A hands-on approach.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic CT perfusion measurement in a cardiac phantom.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew J Einstein

Funding

PROMISE Trial: Substudy to Assess for Effective Dose of RadiationR01HL109711 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EINSTEIN, ANDREW · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109711PHS HHS 23179943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageCardiac-Gated Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted TomographyFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID23407991
PMCPMC3625482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.