Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23407960›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

A two-layer biophysical model of cholinergic neuromodulation in olfactory bulb.

Guoshi Li, Thomas A Cleland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Connectivity and dynamics in the olfactory bulb.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Systematic Framework for Olfactory Bulb Signal Transformations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guoshi LiComputational Physiology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. GL275@cornell.edu
Thomas A Cleland
Cornell University · US

Funding

CRCNS: Cholinergic regulation of sensory computationR01DC009948 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
CRCNS: Higher-order feature detection in olfactory bulbR01DC012249 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A · 2011 to 2013
$704k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009948NIDCD NIH HHS DC012249NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009948NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholinergic inputs from the basal forebrain regulate multiple olfactory bulb (OB) functions, including odor discrimination, perceptual learning, and short-term memory. Previous studies have shown that nicotinic cholinergic receptor activation sharpens mitral cell chemoreceptive fields, likely via intraglomerular circuitry. Muscarinic cholinergic activation is less well understood, though muscarinic receptors are implicated in olfactory learning and in the regulation of synchronized oscillatory dynamics in hippocampus and cortex. To understand the mechanisms underlying cholinergic neuromodulation in OB, we developed a biophysical model of the OB neuronal network including both glomerular layer and external plexiform layer (EPL) computations and incorporating both nicotinic and muscarinic neuromodulatory effects. Our simulations show how nicotinic activation within glomerular circuits sharpens mitral cell chemoreceptive fields, even in the absence of EPL circuitry, but does not facilitate intrinsic oscillations or spike synchronization. In contrast, muscarinic receptor activation increases mitral cell spike synchronization and field oscillatory power by potentiating granule cell excitability and lateral inhibitory interactions within the EPL, but it has little effect on mitral cell firing rates and hence does not sharpen olfactory representations under a rate metric. These results are consistent with the theory that EPL interactions regulate the timing, rather than the existence, of mitral cell action potentials and perform their computations with respect to a spike timing-based metric. This general model suggests that the roles of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in olfactory bulb are both distinct and complementary to one another, together regulating the effects of ascending cholinergic inputs on olfactory bulb transformations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCalcium SignalingCell MembraneComputer SimulationCytoplasmic GranulesKineticsMembrane PotentialsNerve NetNeural ConductionNeuronsOdorantsOlfactory BulbReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID23407960
PMCPMC3711624
OpenAlexW2062775959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.