Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23407941›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Microscale inhomogeneity of brain tissue distorts electrical signal propagation.

Matthew J Nelson, Clémentine Bosch, Laurent Venance, Pierre Pouget

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Quantitative basis for neuroimaging of cortical laminae with calibrated functional MRI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew J NelsonCentre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Inserm UMRS 975, CNRS 7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 75651 Paris, France. matthew.nelson@icm-institute.org
Clémentine Bosch
Laurent Venance
Pierre Pouget

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpretations of local field potentials (LFPs) are typically shaped on an assumption that the brain is a homogenous conductive milieu. However, microscale inhomogeneities including cell bodies, dendritic structures, axonal fiber bundles and blood vessels are unequivocally present and have different conductivities and permittivities than brain extracellular fluid. To determine the extent to which these obstructions affect electrical signal propagation on a microscale, we delivered electrical stimuli intracellularly to individual cells while simultaneously recording the extracellular potentials at different locations in a rat brain slice. As compared with relatively unobstructed paths, signals were attenuated across frequencies when fiber bundles were in between the stimulated cell and the extracellular electrode. Across group of cell bodies, signals were attenuated at low frequencies, but facilitated at high frequencies. These results show that LFPs do not reflect a democratic representation of neuronal contributions, as certain neurons may contribute to the LFP more than others based on the local extracellular environment surrounding them.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBlood VesselsBrainDendritesElectric StimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaExtracellular SpaceFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMembrane PotentialsNerve FibersNeurogliaPatch-Clamp TechniquesRats

Identifiers

PMID23407941
PMCPMC6619221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.