Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23407730›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2013

Accuracy of the "traffic light" clinical decision rule for serious bacterial infections in young children with fever: a retrospective cohort study.

Sukanya De, Gabrielle J Williams, Andrew Hayen, Petra Macaskill, Mary McCaskill, David Isaacs, Jonathan C Craig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Aspects of triage for infants: a narrative review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  5. Identifying serious bacterial illness in children: is it time to show the red card to NICE's red flags?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Accuracy of the NICE traffic light system in children presenting to general practice: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Use of alarm features in referral of febrile children to the emergency department: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sukanya DeScreening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia. sukanya.de@health.nsw.gov.au
Gabrielle J Williams
Andrew Hayen
Petra Macaskill
Mary McCaskill
David Isaacs
Jonathan C Craig

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the accuracy of a clinical decision rule (the traffic light system developed by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)) for detecting three common serious bacterial infections (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and bacteraemia) in young febrile children.

designRetrospective analysis of data from a two year prospective cohort study

settingA paediatric emergency department.

participants15,781 cases of children under 5 years of age presenting with a febrile illness.

main outcome measuresClinical features were used to categorise each febrile episodes as low, intermediate, or high probability of serious bacterial infection (green, amber, and red zones of the traffic light system); these results were checked (using standard radiological and microbiological tests) for each of the infections of interest and for any serious bacterial infection.

resultsAfter combination of the intermediate and high risk categories, the NICE traffic light system had a test sensitivity of 85.8% (95% confidence interval 83.6% to 87.7%) and specificity of 28.5% (27.8% to 29.3%) for the detection of any serious bacterial infection. Of the 1140 cases of serious bacterial infection, 157 (13.8%) were test negative (in the green zone), and, of these, 108 (68.8%) were urinary tract infections. Adding urine analysis (leucocyte esterase or nitrite positive), reported in 3653 (23.1%) episodes, to the traffic light system improved the test performance: sensitivity 92.1% (89.3% to 94.1%), specificity 22.3% (20.9% to 23.8%), and relative positive likelihood ratio 1.10 (1.06 to 1.14).

conclusionThe NICE traffic light system failed to identify a substantial proportion of serious bacterial infections, particularly urinary tract infections. The addition of urine analysis significantly improved test sensitivity, making the traffic light system a more useful triage tool for the detection of serious bacterial infections in young febrile children.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesBacterial InfectionsChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFeverHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23407730
PMCPMC3571679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.