Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23407181›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2013

Duration of empirical antibiotic therapy for infants suspected of early-onset sepsis.

C Michael Cotten, P Brian Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A decade of neonatal sepsis caused by gram-negative bacilli-a retrospective matched cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Anti-microbial stewardship: antibiotic use in well-appearing term neonates born to mothers with chorioamnionitis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial therapy in neonatal intensive care unit.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2015
    Review
  11. Bacterial meningitis in infants.Clinics in perinatology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C Michael CottenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. cotte010@mc.duke.edu
P Brian Smith

Funding

NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD040492 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COTTEN, CHARLES MICHAEL · 2001 to 2015
$5.4M
North Carolina Clinical CenterUG1HD040492 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHARLES Michael COTTEN, Matthew Laughon · 2016 to 2026
$3.4M
Genetic Basis for Impaired Angiogenic Signaling in BPDR01HL085703 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ABMAN, STEVEN HERBERT · 2008 to 2012
$3.3M
Gastrin-Releasing Peptide and Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaR01HL105702 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COTTEN, CHARLES MICHAEL, DAVIS, STEPHANIE DUGGINS · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
Lab-on-a-chip for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia ScreeningR44HD062316 · NICHD · ADVANCED LIQUID LOGIC · PI SRINIVASAN, VIJAY · 2011 to 2012
$1.5M
PHARMACOKINETICS OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN HIGH RISK INFANTSK23HD060040 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PHILLIP BRIAN · 2009 to 2012
$445k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01 HL105702 01A1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085703NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105702NICHD NIH HHS 1K23HD060040-01NICHD NIH HHS 2R44HD062316-02NICHD NIH HHS 5U10 HD040492-10NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD060040NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD069892NICHD NIH HHS R44 HD062316NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD040492NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD040492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewClinicians' adherence to the Centers for Disease Control guidelines to prevent group B Streptococcus (GBS) early-onset sepsis (EOS) has reduced GBS EOS. Although evidence-based testing and empirical antibiotic initiation are likely saving lives, clinicians have less compelling data to guide duration of empirically initiated antibiotics when cultures remain sterile and clinical signs resolve quickly. Our purpose is to review current opinions and evidence influencing clinicians' choices for duration of empirically initiated antibiotics in newborns with sterile cultures. RECENT

findingsRetrospective cohort studies indicate potential for harm with longer duration of empirical antibiotics for EOS when cultures are sterile. Cohort studies indicate timing of widely used tests used to estimate EOS risk affects their predictive value, and tests acquired 24-48 h postnatally may provide reassurance for safe discontinuation. SUMMARY: Every day clinicians caring for thousands of neonates in the United States stop antibiotics which were started empirically to treat EOS on the first postnatal day. Evidence is lacking to support a universal approach to decisions on duration of empirical antibiotics when cultures remain sterile. Reviewing predictive value relative to timing of laboratory testing can help clinicians develop locally appropriate antimicrobial duration decision-making guidelines.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinDrug Administration ScheduleEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInfant, NewbornSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID23407181
PMCPMC3596444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.