Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23406913›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2013

Issues for new antiepilepsy drug development.

Michele Simonato, Jacqueline A French, Aristea S Galanopoulou, Terence J O'Brien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epilepsy management: newer agents, unmet needs, and future treatment strategies.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2014
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michele SimonatoSection of Pharmacology, Department of Medical Sciences, Neuroscience Center, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 17–19,Ferrara, Italy. michele.simonato@unife.it
Jacqueline A French
Aristea S Galanopoulou
Terence J O'Brien

Funding

AGE RELATED SEIZURE SUPPRESSIONR01NS020253 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI MOSHE, SOLOMON L. · 1985 to 2011
$4.7M
Age related seizure suppressionR56NS020253 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MOSHE, SOLOMON L. · 2007 to 2007
$498k
Screening for new therapies for refractory infantile spasmsR21NS078333 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GALANOPOULOU, ARISTEA S · 2012 to 2013
$452k
NINDS NIH HHS NS020253NINDS NIH HHS NS078333NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS020253NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS078333NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS020253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPreclinical research in epileptology has been very successful in producing effective drugs. Unfortunately, however, seizures are still not adequately controlled in a third of the affected individuals, and comorbidities still impose a major burden on the quality of life. New preclinical and clinical drug development strategies are needed to identify drugs that target these unmet medical needs. RECENT

findingsEven in recent years, the antiseizure approach based on screenings has contributed to the identification of new drugs. Thus, it should not be abandoned. However, we propose that a radically new approach, specifically designed to tackle the existing gaps in care, should be developed to complement the traditional screening. This new approach will require integrated strategies for preclinical screening and experimental trial design. In this review, we will attempt to address some of the issues that must be resolved to engage this effort. Are there suitable models to tackle the unmet therapeutic needs in epilepsy? Are there ways to de-risk the transition from preclinical to clinical studies? Are there ways to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and to design ad hoc trials for the unmet therapeutic needs? SUMMARY: Development and validation of a new, integrated strategy for antiepilepsy drug development is needed to identify truly innovative drugs.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug DiscoveryEpilepsyHumans

Identifiers

PMID23406913
PMCPMC3770466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.