Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23406909›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2013

Sex differences in autism spectrum disorders.

Donna M Werling, Daniel H Geschwind

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 619 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
619citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

619 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does the Extreme Male Brain Hypothesis of Autism Apply More to Females Than Males? A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Approach.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Eye Tracking as a Treatment Monitoring Tool for Autism: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Autism Symptom Presentation and Hierarchical Models of Intelligence.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article

559 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Donna M WerlingNeuroscience Interdepartmental Program, Brain Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Daniel H Geschwind
Gomel Engineering Institute · BY

Funding

Investigation of sex differences associated with autism candidate gene, Cyfip1F31MH093086 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WERLING, DONNA MARIE · 2010 to 2013
$96k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH093086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewA strong male bias in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) prevalence has been observed with striking consistency, but no mechanism has yet to definitively account for this sex difference. This review explores the current status of epidemiological, genetic, and neuroendocrinological work addressing ASD prevalence and liability in males and females, so as to frame the major issues necessary to pursue a more complete understanding of the biological basis for sex-differential risk. RECENT

findingsRecent studies continue to report a male bias in ASD prevalence, but also suggest that sex differences in phenotypic presentation, including fewer restricted and repetitive behaviors and externalizing behavioral problems in females, may contribute to this bias. Genetic studies demonstrate that females are protected from the effects of heritable and de-novo ASD risk variants, and compelling work suggests that sex chromosomal genes and/or sex hormones, especially testosterone, may modulate the effects of genetic variation on the presentation of an autistic phenotype. SUMMARY: ASDs affect females less frequently than males, and several sex-differential genetic and hormonal factors may contribute. Future work to determine the mechanisms by which these factors confer risk and protection to males and females is essential.

Indexed as

Child Development Disorders, PervasiveChildFemaleHumansMaleSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID23406909
PMCPMC4164392
OpenAlexW2087547434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.