Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23406835›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Successes, failures and new perspectives of idiotypic vaccination for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

Elena Muraro, Debora Martorelli, Riccardo Dolcetti

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena MuraroCancer Bio-Immunotherapy Unit; CRO-IRCCS; National Cancer Institute; Aviano, Italy.
Debora Martorelli
Riccardo Dolcetti
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITNational Cancer Institute · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idiotype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas has been intensively investigated for its proven immunogenicity as a promising cancer vaccine. Indeed, available data clearly indicate that these vaccines are able to induce tumor-specific immune responses and molecular remissions in patients with follicular lymphoma. However, only one of the three phase III trials performed so far demonstrated a prolonged disease-free survival in vaccinated patients. The observed failures have been mainly ascribed to defects in the study design and not to the limited efficacy of idiotype vaccines per se. Therefore, innovative and optimized idiotype-based vaccine formulations are being developed in order to overcome current limitations and improve the clinical benefit of this immunotherapeutic strategy. Among the most promising advances, the development of "off-the-shelf" vaccines appears of particular relevance, being potentially able to overcome the limitations related to the complex, time-consuming and expensive production of the individualized idiotypic vaccines currently used. Moreover, there is a pressing need to identify biomarkers suitable for the identification of the subset of patients who are most likely to benefit from vaccination. Recent findings also indicate that idiotypic vaccines may be safely and successfully used in additional clinical settings, including lymphoma patients after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalHumansImmunoglobulin IdiotypesLymphoma, B-CellVaccinationCancer VaccinesImmunoglobulin Idiotypescancerepitopeidiotypelymphomavaccine

Identifiers

PMID23406835
PMCPMC3899143
OpenAlexW2062593554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.