Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23406816›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against meningococcal B among Dutch infants: Crucial impact of changes in incidence.

Koen B Pouwels, Eelko Hak, Arie van der Ende, Hannah Christensen, Germie P J M van den Dobbelsteen, Maarten J Postma

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lifecycle model-based evaluation of infant 4CMenB vaccination in the UK.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Health Technology Assessment of meningococcal B vaccine (TrumenbaJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  12. Optimal use of meningococcal serogroup B vaccines: moving beyond outbreak control.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Koen B PouwelsUnit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics (PE); Department of Pharmacy; University of Groningen; Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eelko Hak
Arie van der Ende
Hannah Christensen
Germie P J M van den Dobbelsteen
Maarten J Postma
Pharmac · NZAcademic Medical Center · NLIntravacc (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecently, a vaccine with the capacity to protect against serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) disease received a positive opinion of the European Medicines Agency. Previously, such a vaccine was estimated to be cost-effective. However, since then, the MenB disease incidence has declined drastically in the Netherlands. Therefore, we re-assessed the potential incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of vaccinating infants in the Netherlands with a MenB vaccine.

resultsRoutine infant vaccination (2, 3, 4+11 mo) could prevent 39 cases of MenB disease in a single birth cohort, corresponding to a total gain of 133 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). However, this strategy is unlikely to be cost-effective if the vaccine costs €40 per dose (€243,778 per QALY). At a disease incidence of 5.7 per 100,000 person-years or a vaccine price of €10 per dose including administration costs, the ICER becomes more acceptable and remains below a threshold of €50,000 per QALY.

methodsA cohort of 185,000 Dutch newborns was followed in a Markov model to compare routine vaccination against MenB disease with no vaccination. The ICER was estimated for different disease incidences. The study was performed from a societal perspective.

conclusionsAt the current low level of disease incidence, introduction of routine infant vaccination, following a 2, 3, 4+11 mo schedule, against MenB disease is unlikely cost-effective in the Netherlands. If the MenB disease incidence increases or the vaccine price is substantially lower than €40, routine infant vaccination has the potential to be cost-effective.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup BNetherlandsVaccinationMeningococcal Vaccinescost-effectivenessdisease incidenceinfantsmeningococcal Bvaccine

Identifiers

PMID23406816
PMCPMC3899149
OpenAlexW1970558005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.