Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23406688›Full record

SynthesisHeart (British Cardiac Society)2013

South Asians and coronary disease: is there discordance between effects on incidence and prognosis?

M Justin S Zaman, Pete Philipson, Ruoling Chen, Ahmed Farag, Martin Shipley, Michael G Marmot, Adam D Timmis, Harry Hemingway

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01163513 (Cardiovascular Disease Research Using Linked Bespoke Studies and Electronic Records), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01163513 unknown statusnot on this map

Cardiovascular Disease Research Using Linked Bespoke Studies and Electronic Records

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2009 to 2010Enrolled100,000ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndromes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M Justin S ZamanDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK. justin.zaman@nhs.net
Pete Philipson
Ruoling Chen
Ahmed Farag
Martin Shipley
Michael G Marmot
Adam D Timmis
Harry Hemingway

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674British Heart Foundation RG/13/2/30098Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10314Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G0601647Medical Research Council G0701830Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council G1000616Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G8802774Medical Research Council MC_PC_13041Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Medical Research Council MR/K013351/1Wellcome Trust 086091/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether the effect of South Asian ethnicity differs between studies of incidence and prognosis of coronary disease.

designSystematic literature review and meta-analysis, and cohort analysis from a national acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registry linked to mortality (National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research/Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project).

settingInternational for the review, and England and Wales for the cohort analysis. PATIENTS: The numbers of South Asians included in the meta-analysis were 111 555 (incidence) and 14 531 (prognosis) of whom 8251 were from the ACS cohort.

main outcome measuresIncidence studies: non-fatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary heart disease; prognostic studies: mortality; HRs for 1-year all-cause death in ACS cohort.

resultsSouth Asians had higher incidence of coronary disease compared with white subjects (HR 1.35 95% CI 1.30 to 1.40) based on meta-analysis of nine studies. Among 10 studies on prognosis, South Asians had better prognosis compared with white subjects (HR 0.78 95% CI 0.74 to 0.82). In the ACS cohort, the impact of diabetes (42.4% of South Asians, 16.9% of white subjects) on 1-year mortality was stronger in South Asians than white subjects (age-adjusted HR 1.83 95% CI 1.59 to 2.11 vs 1.53 95% CI 1.49 to 1.57). However, prognosis was better in South Asians even among diabetics, older people and those living in areas of the highest social deprivation.

conclusionsSouth Asian ethnicity is associated with higher incidence of coronary disease, but lower mortality once coronary disease is manifest. The dissociation between effects on incidence and prognosis suggests that public health initiatives to reduce inequalities in mortality between South Asian and white populations should focus on primary prevention. This is a CALIBER study with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01163513.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleRegistriesWhite PeopleCoronary DiseaseEnglandHumansIncidencePrognosisRisk FactorsSurvival RateWales

Identifiers

PMID23406688
PMCPMC3960593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.