Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23405159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

An inverse switch in DNA base excision and strand break repair contributes to melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells.

Mirta M L Sousa, Kamila Anna Zub, Per Arne Aas, Audun Hanssen-Bauer, Aida Demirovic, Antonio Sarno, Erming Tian, Nina B Liabakk, Geir Slupphaug

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Research progress on the role of the NEIL family in cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Role of DNA Repair in Genomic Instability of Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mirta M L SousaDepartment of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Kamila Anna Zub
Per Arne Aas
Audun Hanssen-Bauer
Aida Demirovic
Antonio Sarno
Erming Tian
Nina B Liabakk
Geir Slupphaug
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Tumor Cell-Microenvironment Interactions in the Molecular Pathogenesis of MultiplP01CA055819 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BELLAMY, WILLIAM T · 1993 to 2013
$49.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA055819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in checkpoint and DNA repair pathways may provide adaptive mechanisms contributing to acquired drug resistance. Here, we investigated the levels of proteins mediating DNA damage signaling and -repair in RPMI8226 multiple myeloma cells and its Melphalan-resistant derivative 8226-LR5. We observed markedly reduced steady-state levels of DNA glycosylases UNG2, NEIL1 and MPG in the resistant cells and cross-resistance to agents inducing their respective DNA base lesions. Conversely, repair of alkali-labile sites was apparently enhanced in the resistant cells, as substantiated by alkaline comet assay, autoribosylation of PARP-1, and increased sensitivity to PARP-1 inhibition by 4-AN or KU58684. Reduced base-excision and enhanced single-strand break repair would both contribute to the observed reduction in genomic alkali-labile sites, which could jeopardize productive processing of the more cytotoxic Melphalan-induced interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs). Furthermore, we found a marked upregulation of proteins in the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of double-strand break (DSB) repair, likely contributing to the observed increase in DSB repair kinetics in the resistant cells. Finally, we observed apparent upregulation of ATR-signaling and downregulation of ATM-signaling in the resistant cells. This was accompanied by markedly increased sensitivity towards Melphalan in the presence of ATR-, DNA-PK, or CHK1/2 inhibitors whereas no sensitizing effect was observed subsequent to ATM inhibition, suggesting that replication blocking lesions are primary triggers of the DNA damage response in the Melphalan resistant cells. In conclusion, Melphalan resistance is apparently contributed by modulation of the DNA damage response at multiple levels, including downregulation of specific repair pathways to avoid repair intermediates that could impair efficient processing of cytotoxic ICLs and ICL-induced DSBs. This study has revealed several novel candidate biomarkers for Melphalan sensitivity that will be included in targeted quantitation studies in larger patient cohorts to validate their value in prognosis as well as targets for replacement- or adjuvant therapies.

Indexed as

8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternCell CycleCell ProliferationComet AssayDeoxyguanosineDNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDNA ReplicationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody Technique8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorDeoxyguanosineDNA-Activated Protein KinaseMelphalanPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID23405159
PMCPMC3566207
OpenAlexW1998864945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.