Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23405123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Impact of diabetes on oncologic outcome of colorectal cancer patients: colon vs. rectal cancer.

Justin Y Jeon, Duck Hyoun Jeong, Min Geun Park, Ji-Won Lee, Sang Hui Chu, Ji-Hye Park, Mi Kyung Lee, Kaori Sato, Jennifer A Ligibel, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Diabetes mellitus and colorectal carcinoma outcomes: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Metformin as an adjuvant treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of exercise on colorectal cancer prevention and treatment.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations between physical activity and comorbidities in Korean cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Epidemiology and biology of physical activity and cancer recurrence.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Justin Y JeonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Duck Hyoun Jeong
Min Geun Park
Ji-Won Lee
Sang Hui Chu
Ji-Hye Park
Mi Kyung Lee
Kaori Sato
Jennifer A Ligibel
Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
Nam Kyu Kim

Funding

The Influence of Diet and Lifestyle on Patients with Advanced Colorectal CancerR01CA149222 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI MEYERHARDT, JEFFREY A · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the impact of diabetes on outcomes in colorectal cancer patients and to examine whether this association varies by the location of tumor (colon vs. rectum). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study includes 4,131 stage I-III colorectal cancer patients, treated between 1995 and 2007 (12.5% diabetic, 53% colon, 47% rectal) in South Korea. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine the prognostic influence of DM on survival endpoints.

resultsColorectal cancer patients with DM had significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.37] compared with patients without DM. When considering colon and rectal cancer independently, DM was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92), DFS (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.15-1.84) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.98-1.76) in colon cancer patients. No association for OS, DFS or RFS was observed in rectal cancer patients. There was significant interaction of location of tumor (colon vs. rectal cancer) with DM on OS (P = 0.009) and DFS (P = 0.007).

conclusionsThis study suggests that DM negatively impacts survival outcomes of patients with colon cancer but not rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsConfidence IntervalsDiabetes MellitusDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsRepublic of KoreaTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23405123
PMCPMC3566217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.