Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23405056›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2013

Micro-/nanofluidics based cell electroporation.

Shengnian Wang, L James Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sample Preparation in Microbial Metabolomics: Advances and Challenges.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Micromotor-based localized electroporation and gene transfection of mammalian cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Non-viral Gene Delivery Methods for Bone and Joints.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Transfection in perfused microfluidic cell culture devices: A case study.Process biochemistry (Barking, London, England) · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shengnian WangInstitute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana 71272, USA and Chemical Engineering Program, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana 71272, USA.
L James Lee
Louisiana Tech University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Microfluidics-Mediated Delivery of Biomolecule Probes for Stem Cells and Cancer CR15CA156146 · NCI · LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SHENGNIAN · 2011 to 2011
$330k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA156146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-viral gene delivery has been extensively explored as the replacement for viral systems. Among various non-viral approaches, electroporation has gained increasing attention because of its easy operation and no restrictions on probe or cell type. Several effective systems are now available on the market with reasonably good gene delivery performance. To facilitate broader biological and medical applications, micro-/nanofluidics based technologies were introduced in cell electroporation during the past two decades and their advances are summarized in this perspective. Compared to the commercially available bulk electroporation systems, they offer several advantages, namely, (1) sufficiently high pulse strength generated by a very low potential difference, (2) conveniently concentrating, trapping, and regulating the position and concentration of cells and probes, (3) real-time monitoring the intracellular trafficking at single cell level, and (4) flexibility on cells to be transfected (from single cell to large scale cell population). Some of the micro-devices focus on cell lysis or fusion as well as the analysis of cellular properties or intracellular contents, while others are designed for gene transfection. The uptake of small molecules (e.g., dyes), DNA plasmids, interfering RNAs, and nanoparticles has been broadly examined on different types of mammalian cells, yeast, and bacteria. A great deal of progress has been made with a variety of new micro-/nanofluidic designs to address challenges such as electrochemical reactions including water electrolysis, gas bubble formation, waste of expensive reagents, poor cell viability, low transfection efficacy, higher throughput, and control of transfection dosage and uniformity. Future research needs required to advance micro-/nanofluidics based cell electroporation for broad life science and medical applications are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID23405056
PMCPMC3555966
OpenAlexW1972203659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.