ArticleBiomicrofluidics2013
Micro-/nanofluidics based cell electroporation.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidic Platforms for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Gene Therapy.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Size-selective microfluidics delineate the effects of combinatorial immunotherapy on T-cell response dynamics at the single-cell level.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Efficient electroporation in primary cells with PEDOT:PSS electrodes.Science advances · 2024Article
- Operando investigation of the synergistic effect of electric field treatment and copper for bacteria inactivation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Sample Preparation in Microbial Metabolomics: Advances and Challenges.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Gene Electrotransfer into Mammalian Cells Using Commercial Cell Culture Inserts with Porous Substrate.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Microscale Electroporation.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Micromotor-based localized electroporation and gene transfection of mammalian cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Method Development Progress in Genetic Engineering of Thraustochytrids.Marine drugs · 2021Review
- Article
- Emerging Roles of 1D Vertical Nanostructures in Orchestrating Immune Cell Functions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2020Review
- Single-Cell Electroporation with Real-Time Impedance Assessment Using a Constriction Microchannel.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Non-viral Gene Delivery Methods for Bone and Joints.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Microfluidic Irreversible Electroporation-A Versatile Tool to Extract Intracellular Contents of Bacteria and Yeast.Metabolites · 2019Article
- Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- Microfluidic engineering of exosomes: editing cellular messages for precision therapeutics.Lab on a chip · 2018Review
- Nanofluidic crystals: nanofluidics in a close-packed nanoparticle array.Lab on a chip · 2017Review
- Transfection in perfused microfluidic cell culture devices: A case study.Process biochemistry (Barking, London, England) · 2017Article
- Engineering biological systems using automated biofoundries.Metabolic engineering · 2017Review
- Microscale Symmetrical Electroporator Array as a Versatile Molecular Delivery System.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Non-viral gene delivery has been extensively explored as the replacement for viral systems. Among various non-viral approaches, electroporation has gained increasing attention because of its easy operation and no restrictions on probe or cell type. Several effective systems are now available on the market with reasonably good gene delivery performance. To facilitate broader biological and medical applications, micro-/nanofluidics based technologies were introduced in cell electroporation during the past two decades and their advances are summarized in this perspective. Compared to the commercially available bulk electroporation systems, they offer several advantages, namely, (1) sufficiently high pulse strength generated by a very low potential difference, (2) conveniently concentrating, trapping, and regulating the position and concentration of cells and probes, (3) real-time monitoring the intracellular trafficking at single cell level, and (4) flexibility on cells to be transfected (from single cell to large scale cell population). Some of the micro-devices focus on cell lysis or fusion as well as the analysis of cellular properties or intracellular contents, while others are designed for gene transfection. The uptake of small molecules (e.g., dyes), DNA plasmids, interfering RNAs, and nanoparticles has been broadly examined on different types of mammalian cells, yeast, and bacteria. A great deal of progress has been made with a variety of new micro-/nanofluidic designs to address challenges such as electrochemical reactions including water electrolysis, gas bubble formation, waste of expensive reagents, poor cell viability, low transfection efficacy, higher throughput, and control of transfection dosage and uniformity. Future research needs required to advance micro-/nanofluidics based cell electroporation for broad life science and medical applications are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.