Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23405042›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2013

Our words, our story: a textual analysis of articles published in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association/Journal of the Medical Library Association from 1961 to 2010.

Mark E Funk

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. One leg at a time: medical librarians and fake news.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2024
    Article
  5. Mapping the health science librarianship research field in 2012-2022.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building visualization skills through investigating theJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Let's get a stronger evidence base for our decisions.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mark E FunkResources Management, Samuel J. Wood Library, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. mefunk@med.cornell.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis lecture explores changes in the medical library profession over the last fifty years, as revealed by individual word usage in a body of literature.

methodsI downloaded articles published in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association and Journal of the Medical Library Association between 1961 and 2000 to create an electronic corpus and tracked annual frequency of individual word usage. I used frequency sparklines of words, matching one of four archetypal shapes (level, rise, fall, and rise-and-fall) to identify significant words.

resultsMost significant words fell into the categories of environment, management, technology, and research. Based on word usage changes, the following trends are revealed: Compared to 1961, today's medical librarians are more concerned with digital information, not physical packages. We prefer information to be evidence-based. We focus more on health than medicine. We are reaching out to new constituents, sometimes leaving our building to do so. Teaching has become important for us. We run our libraries more like businesses, using constantly changing technology. We are publishing more research articles.

conclusionsAlthough these words were chosen by individual authors to tell their particular stories, in the aggregate, our words reveal our story of change in our profession.

Indexed as

History, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyLibrary AssociationsMedical InformaticsPeriodicals as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23405042
PMCPMC3543134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.