Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23404665›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2014

The impact of a prevention delivery system on perceived social capital: the PROSPER project.

Sarah M Chilenski, Patricia M Ang, Mark T Greenberg, Mark E Feinberg, Richard Spoth

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Promoting Voter Turnout: an Unanticipated Impact of Early-Childhood Preventive Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Trial
  2. Examining the Highs and Lows of the Collaborative Relationship Between Technical Assistance Providers and Prevention Implementers.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Resource Sharing Networks on Community Anti-Drug Coalitions' Outcomes: A Social Network Analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  8. Development of a framework for the collaborative adaptation of service models for child and family health in diverse settings (CASCADES).Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Community Prevention Coalition Context and Capacity Assessment: Comparing the United States and Mexico.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Factors that predict financial sustainability of community coalitions: five years of findings from the PROSPER partnership project.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah M ChilenskiPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. sarah.chilenski@gmail.com.
Patricia M AngUniversity of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia.
Mark T GreenbergPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Mark E FeinbergPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Richard SpothPartnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS R01DA013709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study examined the impact of the PROSPER delivery system for evidence-based prevention programs on multiple indicators of social capital in a rural and semi-rural community sample. Utilizing a randomized blocked design, 317 individuals in 28 communities across two states were interviewed at three time points over the course of 2.5 years. Bridging, linking, and the public life skills forms of social capital were assessed via community members' and leaders' reports on the perceptions of school functioning and the Cooperative Extension System, collaboration among organizations, communication and collaboration around youth problems, and other measures. Longitudinal mixed model results indicate significant improvements in some aspects of bridging and linking social capital in PROSPER intervention communities. Given the strength of the longitudinal and randomized research design, results advance prevention science by suggesting that community collaborative prevention initiatives can significantly impact community social capital in a rural and semi-rural sample. Future research should further investigate changes in social capital in different contexts and how changes in social capital relate to other intervention effects.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsSocial CapitalSocial ChangeCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePreventive Health ServicesResidence CharacteristicsRural PopulationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23404665
PMCPMC3718867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.