Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23404618›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2013

Sex differences in cardiac autonomic regulation and in repolarisation electrocardiography.

Peter Smetana, Marek Malik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. The relevance of the superior cervical ganglion for cardiac autonomic innervation in health and disease: a systematic review.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Development of autonomic heart rate modulations during childhood and adolescence.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of cocaine and/or heroin use on resting cardiovascular function.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Association between Work-Related Stress and QT Prolongation in Male Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter SmetanaWilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Marek Malik
St George's, University of London · GBWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The review summarises the present knowledge on the sex differences in cardiac autonomic regulations and in related aspects of electrocardiography with particular attention to myocardial repolarisation. Although some of the sex differences are far from fully established, multitude of observations show consistent differences between women and men. Despite more pronounced parasympathetic cardiac regulation, women have higher resting heart rate and lower baroreflex sensitivity. Of the electrocardiographic phenomena, women have longer QT interval duration, repolarisation sequence more synchronised with the inverse of the depolarisation sequence, and likely increased regional heterogeneity of myocardial repolarisation. Studies investigating the relationship of these sex disparities to hormonal differences led frequently to conflicting results. Although sex hormones seem to play a key role by influencing both autonomic tone and electrophysiological properties at the cellular level, neither the truly relevant hormones nor their detailed actions are known. Physiologic usefulness of the described sex differences is also unknown. The review suggests that new studies are needed to advance the understanding of the physiologic mechanisms responsible for these inequalities between women and men and provides key methodological suggestions that need to be followed in future research.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographySex CharacteristicsAutonomic Nervous SystemBaroreflexFemaleHeartHeart RateHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID23404618
OpenAlexW2074014538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.