ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2013
[Compliance of patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin: the COMFORT study].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Saudi Women's Adherence and Experience with Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Cesarean Section Delivery Using Telemedicine Technology.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
- The ABC taxonomy for medication adherence translated into French and German.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- The compliance of thromboprophylaxis affects the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- Continuation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hospital discharge into the outpatient setting: the ACCEPT study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2015Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism and subsequent pulmonary embolism are frequent and sometimes fatal complications in patients after surgical interventions. To prevent thromboembolisms an effective prophylaxis is necessary and outpatients in particular need adequate compliance. The aim of the prospective non-interventional study COMFORT was to analyze 8,091 outpatients after surgical and orthopedic interventions with different risk profiles with respect to factors affecting patient compliance in a positive or negative way. The follow-up period was 14 days and 92.5 % of the patients took the medication for the prescribed duration, 2.1 % (n = 166) terminated the medication too early and no information was available for 5.9 % (n = 442) of the patients. The reasons given for the premature termination of the injections were no more need for prophylaxis and end of medication by order of the physician due to mobilization or adverse events. Of the patients 73 % stated that the administartion was simple and without any problems and the majority of patients recognized injection as the administration mode of low molecular weight heparin to be the most important medication. The findings of this study can contribute to a better understanding of patient compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23404249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.