ArticleObesity surgery2013
A cadaveric porcine model for assessment in laparoscopic bariatric surgery--a validation study.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroendoscopy Training.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic simulation: a promising future for large-scale automated evaluations.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Hand Motion Analysis Illustrates Differences When Drilling Cadaveric and Printed Temporal Bone.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a porcine organ model for training in essential laparoscopic surgical skills.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2020Article
- Validation of Training and Acquisition of Surgical Skills in Veterinary Laparoscopic Surgery: A Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Review
- Simulation platforms to assess laparoscopic suturing skills: a scoping review.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- IMPACT OF A SIMULATED LAPAROSCOPIC TRAINING PROGRAM IN A THREE-YEAR GENERAL SURGERY RESIDENCY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2019Article
- A scoping review of assessment tools for laparoscopic suturing.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Assessment of central venous catheterization in a simulated model using a motion-tracking device: an experimental validation study.Annals of surgical innovation and research · 2016Article
- Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy using a novel perfusedJournal of visualized surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the most effective surgical therapy for morbid obesity. It is an advanced laparoscopic surgical procedure and has a protracted learning curve. Therefore, it is important to develop innovative ways of training and assessing surgeons. The aim of this study is to determine if a cadaveric porcine jejuno-jejunostomy model is an accurate way of assessing a surgeon's technical skills by determining if a correlation exists with how he performs in the operating room.
methodsEight surgeons of varying experience performed a side-to-side stapled jejuno-jejunostomy on a cadaveric bench model before proceeding to perform the procedure on a real patient scheduled for LRYGBP. Performance was assessed using a motion tracking device, the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device. Each procedure was recorded in video and scored by two blinded expert surgeons using procedure-specific rating scales.
resultsThe cadaveric bench model demonstrated concurrent validity with significant correlations between performance on the cadaveric model and patient for dexterity measures. Left-hand path length, r = 0.857 (median, 27, 41.3; P = 0.007), right-hand path length, r = 0.810 (median, 31.5, 60; P = 0.015) and total number of movements, r = 0.743 (median, 422, 637; P = 0.035). This correlation in performance was also demonstrated in the video rating scales, r = 0.727 (median, 13.2, 14.8; P = 0.041). No correlation was found in operative time (median, 541, 742; P = 0.071).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the concurrent validity of the cadaveric porcine model, showing similar performances in surgeons completing a jejuno-jejunostomy on the cadaveric model and the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23404238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.