Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23404220›Full record

Trial reportDer Anaesthesist2013

[Efficacy of a novel warming blanket: prospective randomized trial].

I F Brandes, C Müller, T Perl, S G Russo, M Bauer, A Bräuer

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Anaesthesist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Thermal insulation for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I F BrandesAbteilung Anaesthesiologie, Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
C Müller
T Perl
S G Russo
M Bauer
A Bräuer
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative hypothermia is a common complication of general anesthesia and occurs in up to 50 % of patients during ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery. In this prospective, randomized controlled study the hypothesis that a new conductive warming blanket (Barrier® EasyWarm®, Mölnlycke Health Care Erkrath, Germany) is better in reducing the incidence of perioperative hypothermia in ENT surgery than insulation with a conventional hospital duvet alone was tested. MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter approval of the local ethics committee and written informed consent 80 patients with a planned procedure time between 1 and 3 h were recruited. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium and the core temperature was measured using an esophageal temperature probe. Patients in the study group were warmed at least 30 min prior to induction of anesthesia using the novel warming blanket (Barrier® EasyWarm®) and patients in the control group were insulated with a standard hospital duvet. Data were tested using Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. Time-dependent changes in core temperature were evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Scheffé's test. Results are expressed as mean ± SD or as median and interquartile range (IQR) as appropriate. A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

resultsThe ANOVA did not identify a significantly higher core temperature in the study group at any time point. Furthermore, Fisher's exact test showed no differences in the incidence of intraoperative (12 out of 29 versus 10 out of 32 patients, p = 0.44) or postoperative hypothermia (12 out of 29 versus 9 out of 32 patients, p = 0.30) between the groups. No adverse effects were observed.

conclusionsIn the studied patient group the new conductive warming blanket (Barrier® EasyWarm®) showed no superiority compared to conventional thermal insulation alone.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, IntravenousBody TemperatureFemaleHumansHypothermiaIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesRewarming

Identifiers

PMID23404220
OpenAlexW102208554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.