SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Quality analysis of research on the use of benzodiazepines by elderly patients in the emergency room: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the quality of research on the use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) in the emergency room by the elderly population through the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative.
methodsA systematic review was carried out according to the following steps: (1) identification of studies, in which studies were selected from different combinations of the descriptors "elderly-aged," "benzodiazepines," and "emergency room" in the EMBASE-MEDLINE, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases; (2) evaluation of studies, in which the title, abstract, and full text of the studies were assessed; (3) evaluation of the methodological quality of the studies. The criteria used were those included in the STROBE recommendations.
resultsAt the end of the selection process, only six articles were identified which met the specific criteria. The sample sizes in these studies varied from 118 to 1,611 patients. More than half (4) of the studies did not describe the type of design used, whereas all collected demographic data and analyzed details on the use of BZDs, such as type administered and/or its relationship to the symptoms, were shown. No article fully complied with the STROBE criteria.
conclusionsThis review shows a lack of methodological quality in the studies performed to date that have evaluated the use of BZDs in elderly patients in emergency rooms. These findings should guide future research in this subject area, providing a more complete approach on aspects related to the use of medications by this specific population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23404216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.