Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23404211›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2014

Efficacy of everolimus with exemestane versus exemestane alone in Asian patients with HER2-negative, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in BOLERO-2.

Shinzaburo Noguchi, Norikazu Masuda, Hiroji Iwata, Hirofumi Mukai, Jun Horiguchi, Puttisak Puttawibul, Vichien Srimuninnimit, Yutaka Tokuda, Katsumasa Kuroi, Hirotaka Iwase and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 17 institutions in 5 countries.

Shinzaburo NoguchiDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, noguchi@onsurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Norikazu Masuda
Hiroji Iwata
Hirofumi Mukai
Jun Horiguchi
Puttisak Puttawibul
Vichien Srimuninnimit
Yutaka Tokuda
Katsumasa Kuroi
Hirotaka Iwase
Hideo Inaji
Shozo Ohsumi
Woo-Chul Noh
Takahiro Nakayama
Shinji Ohno
Yoshiaki Rai
Byeong-Woo Park
Ashok Panneerselvam
Mona El-Hashimy
Tetiana Taran
Tarek Sahmoud
Yoshinori Ito
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHOsaka University · JPTris Pharma (United States) · USAichi Cancer Center · JPGunma University Hospital · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKumamoto University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPSiriraj Hospital · THSongklanagarind Hospital · THTokai University Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe addition of mTOR inhibitor everolimus (EVE) to exemestane (EXE) was evaluated in an international, phase 3 study (BOLERO-2) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)) breast cancer refractory to letrozole or anastrozole. The safety and efficacy of anticancer treatments may be influenced by ethnicity (Sekine et al. in Br J Cancer 99:1757-62, 2008). Safety and efficacy results from Asian versus non-Asian patients in BOLERO-2 are reported.

methodsPatients were randomized (2:1) to 10 mg/day EVE + EXE or placebo (PBO) + EXE. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, response rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety.

resultsOf 143 Asian patients, 98 received EVE + EXE and 45 received PBO + EXE. Treatment with EVE + EXE significantly improved median PFS versus PBO + EXE among Asian patients by 38 % (HR = 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.41-0.94). Median PFS was also improved among non-Asian patients by 59 % (HR = 0.41; 95 % CI, 0.33-0.50). Median PFS duration among EVE-treated Asian patients was 8.48 versus 4.14 months for PBO + EXE, and 7.33 versus 2.83 months, respectively, in non-Asian patients. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (stomatitis, anemia, elevated liver enzymes, hyperglycemia, and dyspnea) occurred at similar frequencies in Asian and non-Asian patients. Grade 1/2 interstitial lung disease occurred more frequently in Asian patients. Quality of life was similar between treatment arms in Asian patients.

conclusionAdding EVE to EXE provided substantial clinical benefit in both Asian and non-Asian patients with similar safety profiles. This combination represents an improvement in the management of postmenopausal women with HR(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer progressing on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors, regardless of ethnicity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAndrostadienesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsian PeopleBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEverolimusFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTreatment OutcomeAndrostadienesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEverolimusexemestaneMTOR protein, humanSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID23404211
PMCPMC4210660
OpenAlexW2037317523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.