Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23404065›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2013

Post-retrieval extinction as reconsolidation interference: methodological issues or boundary conditions?

Alessia Auber, Vincenzo Tedesco, Carolyn E Jones, Marie-H Monfils, Christian Chiamulera

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Memory erasure by dopamine-gated retrospective learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Reconsolidation and Fear Extinction: An Update.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Locus coeruleus input-modulated reactivation of dentate gyrus opioid-withdrawal engrams promotes extinction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genes · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessia AuberNeuropsychopharmacology Lab., Sect. Pharmacology, Department Public Health and Community Medicine, Univ. of Verona, Verona, Italy. alessia.auber@gmail.com
Vincenzo Tedesco
Carolyn E Jones
Marie-H Monfils
Christian Chiamulera
University of Verona · ITThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Fear memory attenuation: testing reconsolidation-extinction boundariesR01MH091147 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MONFILS, MARIE H. · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Novel paradigm attenuates traumatic memories and prevents return of fearR21MH086805 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MONFILS, MARIE H. · 2010 to 2011
$398k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091147NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memories that are emotionally arousing generally promote the survival of species; however, the systems that modulate emotional learning can go awry, resulting in pathological conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorders, phobias, and addiction. Understanding the conditions under which emotional memories can be targeted is a major research focus as the potential to translate these methods into clinical populations carries important implications. It has been demonstrated that both fear and drug-related memories can be destabilised at their retrieval and require reconsolidation to be maintained. Therefore, memory reconsolidation offers a potential target period during which the aberrant memories underlying psychiatric disorders can be disrupted. Monfils et al. (Science 324:951-955, 2009) have shown for the first time that safe information provided through an extinction session after retrieval (during the reconsolidation window) may update the original memory trace and prevent the return of fear in rats. In recent years, several authors have then tested the effect of post-retrieval extinction on reconsolidation of either fear or drug-related memories in both laboratory animals and humans. In this article, we review the literature on post-reactivation extinction, discuss the differences across studies on the methodological ground, and review the potential boundary conditions that may explain existing discrepancies and limit the potential application of post-reactivation extinction approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsEmotionsExtinction, PsychologicalFearHumansMemoryMemory DisordersMental DisordersRats

Identifiers

PMID23404065
PMCPMC3682675
OpenAlexW2141016365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.