Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23403902›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013

Understanding the impact of genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophy.

Ryan Combs, Marion McAllister, Katherine Payne, Jo Lowndes, Sophie Devery, Andrew R Webster, Susan M Downes, Anthony T Moore, Simon Ramsden, Graeme Black and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation and comparison of five preference-based measures among age-related macular degeneration patients: evidence from mainland China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the feasibility of delivering standardized genomic care using ophthalmology as an example.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  12. Diagnostic exome sequencing in 266 Dutch patients with visual impairment.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Willingness to pay for genetic testing for inherited retinal disease.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan CombsUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Marion McAllister
Katherine Payne
Jo Lowndes
Sophie Devery
Andrew R Webster
Susan M Downes
Anthony T Moore
Simon Ramsden
Graeme Black
Georgina Hall

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capability of genetic technologies is expanding rapidly in the field of inherited eye disease. New genetic testing approaches will deliver a step change in the ability to diagnose and extend the possibility of targeted treatments. However, evidence is lacking about the benefits of genetic testing to support service planning. Here, we report qualitative data about retinal dystrophy families' experiences of genetic testing in United Kingdom. The data were part of a wider study examining genetic eye service provision. Twenty interviewees from families in which a causative mutation had been identified by a genetic eye clinic were recruited to the study. Fourteen interviewees had chosen to have a genetic test and five had not; one was uncertain. In-depth telephone interviews were conducted allowing a thorough exploration of interviewees' views and experiences of the benefits of genetic counselling and testing. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Both affected and unaffected interviewees expressed mainly positive views about genetic testing, highlighting benefits such as diagnostic confirmation, risk information, and better preparation for the future. Negative consequences included the burden of knowledge, moral dilemmas around reproduction, and potential impact on insurance. The offer of genetic testing was often taken up, but was felt unnecessary in some cases. Interviewees in the study reported many benefits, suggesting genetic testing should be available to this patient group. The benefits and risks identified will inform future evaluation of models of service delivery. This research was part of a wider study exploring experiences of families with retinal dystrophy.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInheritance PatternsMaleRetinal Dystrophies

Identifiers

PMID23403902
PMCPMC3798830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.