Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23403583›Full record

ArticleNature communications2013

Perceiving invisible light through a somatosensory cortical prosthesis.

Eric E Thomson, Rafael Carra, Miguel A L Nicolelis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In conversation with Miguel Nicolelis.Nature neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Robust Target Selection in Response to Microstimulation of the Oculomotor System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Neural Plasticity in Sensorimotor Brain-Machine Interfaces.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  7. Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Creating a neuroprosthesis for active tactile exploration of textures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Learning active sensing strategies using a sensory brain-machine interface.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Embedding a Panoramic Representation of Infrared Light in the Adult Rat Somatosensory Cortex through a Sensory Neuroprosthesis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Toward a Proprioceptive Neural Interface that Mimics Natural Cortical Activity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric E ThomsonDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Box 3209, 311 Research Drive, Bryan Research, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Rafael Carra
Miguel A L Nicolelis
Duke University · US

Funding

TRIGEMINAL SYSTEM PLASTICITY DURING FACIAL ANESTHESIAR01DE011451 · NIDCR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 1994 to 2011
$2.5M
A Virtual Reality Simulator to Study VLSBA and Test Brain-Actuating TechnologiesDP1MH099903 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2012 to 2014
$2.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1MH099903NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE011451NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE011451NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH099903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory neuroprostheses show great potential for alleviating major sensory deficits. It is not known, however, whether such devices can augment the subject's normal perceptual range. Here we show that adult rats can learn to perceive otherwise invisible infrared light through a neuroprosthesis that couples the output of a head-mounted infrared sensor to their somatosensory cortex (S1) via intracortical microstimulation. Rats readily learn to use this new information source, and generate active exploratory strategies to discriminate among infrared signals in their environment. S1 neurons in these infrared-perceiving rats respond to both whisker deflection and intracortical microstimulation, suggesting that the infrared representation does not displace the original tactile representation. Hence, sensory cortical prostheses, in addition to restoring normal neurological functions, may serve to expand natural perceptual capabilities in mammals.

Indexed as

Implants, ExperimentalLightAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectric StimulationFemaleInfrared RaysLearningNeuronsRatsRats, Long-EvansSomatosensory CortexVibrissaeVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID23403583
PMCPMC3674834
OpenAlexW2147858384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.